Bill Clinton Drops_SUNDAY BOMBSHELL ON TRUMP: "Bill Said WHAT?!"

Joining us now, Congressman Suhas Subramaniam of Virginia, a member of the House Oversight Committee. Congressman, thanks for joining us this morning. We haven't talked all that much on this show yet about the Bill and Hillary Clinton of this all. What exactly does James Comer want to learn from them?

And when you have the opportunity to sit down with them at the end of next month, what do you want to ask them?

Yeah, well, it does appear as a Bill Clinton, new Jeffrey Epstein. We don't know the extent of their relationship. So I think it's if you're going to target Republicans, you should target Democrats as well. Everyone should be held accountable. I don't really think the Clintons have much to offer. I think this is more of kind of a political targeting and trying to get this story off of Trump and onto another big name. that's a Democrat. That's part of the Republican plan recently, and Clinton fits into that.

One of the things that's really important for us all to remember—I have to remind myself of this—when he was friendly, at least, with Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump was a Democrat. OK? Let's not forget. So when he's talking about, you know, the Democrats are the only people that knew him,

he was a Democrat at the time. He was in those videos pointing at the women and all of that. Just one thing that we need to keep clear. You wrote recently to the FBI director about potential tampering of the Epstein files. I'm going to read you to you. The American people understandably have concerns about the president using his political influence over the files released in either tampering, destroying or selectively releasing and withholding files, particularly in light of the Department of Justice's announcement

to start investigating Democrats who were associated with Epstein." What can and what is the—what are Republicans willing to do that are on the committee? Because I assume you've talked to them about this on the Oversight Committee. What are they willing to do to provide some actual accountability? Because Donald Trump's clearly very involved with the idea of what's in these documents, whether he is telling them what they can release, because that is how he has worked up until this point with this Justice Department.

It's very hands-on, to say the least.

Yeah, I'll say, we've been dragging most of the Republicans on the committee, you know, kicking and screaming this whole time. And so it's been, you know, very difficult, but we've been able to get some of these subpoenas out. But let's remember, the subpoena we've issued to the Trump administration, the entire unredacted release of the files to our committee, and then we can help redact the victims' names and get that out.

The bill that the president just signed is the release of all the files to the public and the committee. This not selectively releasing files that make Democrats look bad. It's not taking, you know, Jeffrey Epstein's brother right now is out there saying that they've cleansed the files, they've tampered with the files. They're in Winchester near my home in Virginia, and that there is something going on there, right?

So we want to get to the bottom of what do they mean when they say Epstein files? How many Epstein files are there? Pam Bondi said they were on her desk. Well, others have said that her desk wouldn't be able to fit all the files that the DOJ FBI have from over the years. So I have some questions and I haven't gotten any answers

yet. How do you hold the DOJ accountable when they're saying, we're going to do this investigation, right? We're going to do this investigation. A lot of people are worried, including Mary McCord, who I think was the first person to say it on MS last week on our show, talked about, you say you're doing an investigation so you don't have to release things. How do you make sure they comply with the bill and now the law?

So if they're selectively releasing files or tampering with files, we have a couple aces in the hole. We have other documents, such as the Epstein Estates documents. We also have subpoenaed the bank records from a few banks. We want more from the committee. And then we have the biggest ace in the hole, which is the victims. The victims can tell us what's missing, what's there, what names have been scrubbed off the

list. And so they've been incredibly helpful in this investigation. So we will know if the Justice Department is playing games with us. Why haven't the victims just directly released documents that they have access to? Lawsuits. Lawsuits and putting them at a huge risk, huge risk. And so they want us, they want to help us by help us work backwards to get to the names rather than telling us all the names themselves. And you know, we have many victims, not all of them have come forward, over a thousand victims,

right? And so, you know, of the ones that have come forward, they don't know all the information themselves either and they want the documents on themselves too. The Justice Department never released their own files and their own information to them. And so they have a lot of questions too.

I want to get to Ghislaine Maxwell. She's a convicted sex trafficker. She was moved to this minimum security prison and the Atlantic, you know, got a hold of some of, of taped emails and info from anonymous sources about the treatment that she's getting there, that she's receiving visitors privately in the prison chapel instead of the regular visitation space. Her lawyer has gained authorization from the warden to bring in private electronic equipment.

And it goes on and on. Again, a convicted sex trafficker who has moved to a minimum security prison. Are you, are others on oversight trying to get information about who signed off on this transfer? And is there any effort by Democrats to try to get her moved back to a higher security prison?

Yeah, I remember she got moved after one of Trump's lawyers would talk to her for many

hours.

Former personal attorney. Exactly. Former personal attorney. And, uh, you know, now she's bra talked to her for many hours. Former personal attorney. Exactly. Former personal attorney. And now she's bragging about her great treatment and talking about how great and what a gentleman the president is. One thing is some of the stuff she's already said that the president wasn't at Jeffrey Epstein's house at various times has already been proven untrue.

And she's a liar, too. I mean, she's been charged of perjury many times. And so, yeah, we don't believe her. I still want to go down to Texas and talk to her, even if she pleads the fifth the whole time. I'm a lawyer. I've been in situations where they planned on pleading the fifth,

and then they changed their mind because they wanted to prove something, especially people with egos. to plead the fifth, so there's no reason to talk to her. And if you plead—so, help people understand this, because she did talk to Todd Blanche, and I assume a lot of the questions that he asked her are going to be similar to some of the questions you would ask her. If you answer those questions at some time, whether you lie or not, can you then plead

the fifth later on those exact same topics?

That's a good question. I don't know exactly whether I would ask the same questions of Todd Blanch. I think Todd Blanch's goal was to protect the president. Todd Blanch had a very different objective here. My objective is to get to the truth and see what Gilead Maxwell will tell us. We'll have the documents later on. We'll find them, even if the Justice Department doesn't release them, we'll find them eventually.

But in any case, I have questions for Gile Julian Maxwell as well. Congressman, I want to follow up on something that you said at the beginning of our conversation, which is that you think that the Clinton route is a distraction from the Trump of it all and what Trump might be covering up. But we do know that Bill Clinton was on Jeffrey Epstein's flight on his flight logs for at least 26 legs.

Some of those were a part of the same international trips that he took. But don't you want to know what Bill Clinton was doing so frequently on Jeffrey Epstein's plane?

Let's be clear. I support the subpoena on Bill Clinton. I think he should come in and tell us what he knows. I don't think he knows much. I think there's a lot of other people who haven't been subpoenaed who know a lot more. But certainly if Bill Clinton, if we can have him in to ask him questions about

what he knows, happy to hear what he knows.

Have you discussed other subpoena targets' names? People like Leon Black, others who

have been named in recent public reporting?

Absolutely. I've even asked for former Prince Andrew to come forward and come to the United States and testify. He's ignored our request to do that. Chuck.

We are willing to bet that when the Magiverse was calling for the release of the Epstein files, it probably didn't think that it would result in the entire movement melting down. But it sure seems like that's what we're witnessing. Not only did it result in Tuesday's near unanimous vote

in Congress to release the files, which Trump, until recently was fighting tooth and nail to keep under wraps. But now it has led to an extremely ugly falling out with one time MAGA super supporter Marjorie Taylor Greene, who now says she will resign her seat on January 5th with Trump attacking her as a traitor and Greene taking an increasingly more public stand with Epstein survivors.

Watching this actually turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart. And the only thing that will speak to the powerful, courageous women behind me is when action is actually taken to release these files and the American people won't tolerate any other bull****. That's where we are today.

Joining us now to discuss Florida Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost. He serves on the House Oversight Committee which has been leading the charge to release the Epstein files. Congressman thanks for joining us. Let's start with the signing of that bill that Trump was slow walking. What are you hoping to get from the Department of Justice before the December 19th

deadline to release it? Well, I mean, it's less about what I'm hoping to get, but it's what legally we're required to get, which is everything pretty much. However, Donald Trump knew that this bill would pass and it's part of the reason he directed the DOJ to start an investigation. I think he's gonna try to hide behind that investigation and not setting us some different bits and pieces of it,

but we'll see how things move forward. I will say that people should stop hoping this investigation because everything that we've gotten this year thus far has not come from the DOJ, right? The things that we've gotten that have been worthwhile, that have shown us more of the connection of Donald Trump to Epstein, and not just Donald Trump, but other people as well have come from the work that oversight Democrats have done in forcing subpoenas to

the estate. We recently put forth subpoenas to bank records as well. That's how we got the birthday card

that Donald Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein.

I gotta say, the Clinton stuff here keeps, I think, putting Trump in trouble. And look, I'm not gonna defend the Clintons and how, because we don't know what happened here. And I do think that if we get a true reckoning around Epstein it's not going to be fully partisan I have a

feeling that a lot of the people that are gonna get like snared up in it are certainly not gonna be on the progressive wing of the Democratic Party that it seems like it's a lot of billionaire types and friendly to billionaire types so I get the sense you're gonna's a lot of billionaire types and friendly to billionaire types. So I get the sense you're going to have a lot of moderate Democrats and a lot of Republicans that get wrapped up in something like this and not necessarily a whole lot of Bernie Sanders types. Right? Like that's my inkling but of course we don't know because we haven't seen the full

breadth of the information. So I do think it's fair to say that, you know, Bill Clinton has questions to answer, but by Trump trying to make this about Bill, it guys, it's still bringing up the stories about Bubba and what may have happened between Trump and Clinton and specifically what Trump may have done below the belt to Bill Clinton.

People are still talking about this. If you go on to Twitter and stuff, people are still talking about this. may have done below the belt to Bill Clinton.

People are still talking about this. If you go on to Twitter and stuff, people are still talking about this. And still to this day, even a couple weeks later, one of the top searches for Trump, like correlated to Trump, is Clinton. It's not number one anymore, but it's in the top four or five, even though that story broke a couple weeks ago and it's because Trump has kept Clinton in the news by saying

actually I want to make this all about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and I want my congressional committees that my party controls to do the same but every time you do that it brings up Bubba which may be Bill Clinton it could also be a horse.

Read in the comments, people will tell you what that means.

So I think that Trump can't win here because every time he tries to make the scandal about Bill, it brings up a scandal of his, at least a rumored scandal. And then also he's miscalculating Democrats position here. Democrats increasingly don't give a damn about Bill Clinton. I'm sorry, they don't. I know a lot of people supported him when he ran, maybe some of the people watching this channel,

but most Democrats I've seen have said, if Bill did what some people think he did, he should face the full consequences of the law.

Right? And so Republicans don't realize Some people think he did, he should face the full consequences of the law.

And so Republicans don't realize that if hypothetically a Republican and a Democrat went to prison And so Republicans don't realize that if hypothetically a Republican and a Democrat went to prison over this, they would be sad, but we would call it justice.