BREAKING: TRUMP IMPLICATED AGAIN IN EPSTEIN FILES

Despite the DOJ's best efforts to obfuscate any mention of Donald Trump, or frankly anyone implicated in Epstein's pedophile ring, in today's very partial, very redacted release of the files, one very damning piece of evidence managed to slip through the cracks. It reads, quote, During one of Doe's encounters with Epstein, he took her to Mar-a-Lago where he introduced her to its owner, Donald J. Trump. Introducing 14 year old Doe to Donald J. Trump, Epstein elbowed Trump playfully, asking him,

referring to Doe, this is a good one, right? Trump smiled and nodded in agreement. They both chuckled and Doe felt uncomfortable, but, at the time, was too young to understand why. And to think, Trump put a thousand FBI agents on the task of redacting every mention of his name only to allow this one to slip through. The reality is that the broader batch of files is almost entirely redacted, showing pages

upon pages of black boxes, despite the fact that the law clearly stated that the only redactions should be to protect victims and or minors. That's it. And yet according to Fox News, it looks like the DOJ took a slightly different approach, opting instead to apply the same redaction standard to politically exposed individuals and government officials. Hmm, I wonder why.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that one of those government officials was reported as being Jeffrey Epstein's best friend for a decade and has more photos alongside Epstein than I have with my own family. It goes without saying, but the reference to Trump is as disgusting as it is predictable. The only reason that we don't have these files in full is expressly because Trump is mentioned in them, just like in this one instance.

This one piece of evidence is precisely the reason that it's been 11 months and all we've gotten from this administration is delay, obfuscation, and now redactions. Because while they promised exposure, what they are delivering is exactly the same pedophile protectionism that they once condemned. In fact, this isn't the only damning evidence

that slipped through the DOJ's fingers. You'll notice that there's a photo of Epstein with one of his victims holding a giant check for $22,500 signed by Trump. If that looks familiar, it's because there was a page in Epstein's birthday book where

Epstein and a longtime Mar-a-Lago member joked about selling a quote, fully depreciated woman to Donald Trump for $22,500. That was revealed by the oversight committee Democrats in September, and now their reporting is corroborated just two months later with the release of this page in the Epstein files. It's almost like everything the Democrats have been saying for months has been true, and everything the Republicans have been saying for months has been part of their effort to

cover up for a pedophile ring because their priority is protecting the criminals and not the victims. Now, it's also worth noting that despite these incriminating pieces of evidence, the vast majority of these files have been redacted, if not just completely suppressed and unreleased. Lest you think that's going to fly with even Republicans, it doesn't seem to be the case.

Thomas Massey tweeted quote, Consider these three attachments. One, Epstein Files Transparency Act. Two, statement from Fox Digital. Three, existing criminal statute. The law itself says quote, No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public

figure, or foreign dignitary. The statement from Fox News says, quote, the Justice Department redacted the names and identifiers of victims. Fox News Digital has learned that the same redaction standards were applied to politically exposed individuals and government officials. And finally, the existing criminal statute says, quote,

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, or any filed under Title 11 or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. In other words, a not so thinly veiled threat aimed at everyone who is engaged in this coverup.

His Epstein Transparency Act co-sponsor Ro Khanna also came out with the following statement.

The Justice Department's document dump this afternoon does not comply with Thomas Massey and my Epstein Transparency Act. They released one document from a New York grand jury of 119 pages, totally blacked out. This despite a federal judge ordering them to release that document. And our law requires them to explain redactions. There's not a single explanation for why that entire document was redacted.

We have not seen the draft indictment that implicates other rich and powerful men who were on Epstein's rape island, who either watched the abuse of young girls or participated in the abuse of young girls or participated in the abuse of young girls and the sex trafficking. The reality is Pam Bondi has obfuscated for months. She first said there were no more documents to be seen.

Now she's admitting and releasing hundreds of thousands of documents, but it is an incomplete release with too many redactions. Thomas Massey and I are exploring all options. It can be the impeachment of people at justice, inherit contempt, or referring for prosecution those who are obstructing justice.

We will work with the survivors to demand the full release of these files, to demand justice for the Epstein class and accountability. You know, to me, this is not a game. It's not about politics. It's about survivors that I've come to know.

And I had talked to them over the past few weeks. They were so looking forward to this day of finally having being seen, having some closure. And in the morning, when we heard the deputy attorney general say there are gonna be hundreds of thousands of documents, Thomas Massey and I said,

well, look, it's probably not a full release, but at least there's some effort at compliance. But then when we saw those documents, we were just shocked. Documents totally redacted. None of the key things actually released. The draft indictmentment the prosecution memo

those documents that would show who were the other rich and powerful men who abused these young girls or covered it up none of the files on the computers of Epstein released that would actually implicate

the other people and you know the country's asking why are you protecting these folks what are you hiding uh... Massie and I already were drafting And, you know, the country's asking, why are you protecting these folks? What are you hiding? Massey and I already were drafting articles of impeachment as we speak about Pam Bondi and Blanchard. We're not going to drop them right away.

They're saying they're going to keep producing things until the end of the year. But we're ready to to use them. And we're talking to survivors about showing up again at the Capitol. We're going to continue the fight.

In other words, it doesn't look like Donald Trump is going to have too much luck if he thinks that selectively releasing just a handful of heavily redacted documents is going to get the job done, especially considering even that heavy redaction is not enough to fully protect Trump himself from being implicated, considering he's very clearly all over these files. Trump really has managed to get the worst of both worlds here.

He is both obviously involved in a cover-up and still deeply implicated on a near-daily basis in the most notorious pedophile ring in US history. And judging by what we've already seen, it's very clear that things are only set to get much, much worse. media platforms to suppress certain voices if they don't like critical coverage. That means my longevity here is in the hands of a few tech billionaires who are already making it clear that they are willing to cater to this administration. To that end, signing up for my newsletter is a way for me to reach you directly if that

ever becomes necessary. I'll put the link right here on the screen as well, so please sign up. I'll put the link right here on the screen as well, so please sign up. It's free, but there's also an option to do a paid subscription if you'd like to