Carney's MAGA Moment in New York May Have Unleashed Something Liberals Can't Take Back

Canada strong will help make America great again.

Well, somebody is not being honest.And I just can't for the life of me figure out who.If Capital is fleeing Canada, moving to other nations, well, you're a Russian sympathizer for bringing that up.If Apple, Google, U .S.Congress and our own Privacy Commissioner says that Canada's legislation is written very poorly and should be redone, apparently that's just misinformation.

If the economy's not doing too hot, that's Trump's fault.If you acknowledge that the Liberal government isn't really that good of a government, well, you are a traitor and you are anti -Canadian.My goodness.I'm Jasmine Lane.Like, share, subscribe, comment your thoughts down below.At least Mark Carney is in New York City, though, talking about the investment paradise that Canada is.

Which I guess the only logical question is, if that's true, why do you have to tell people about it?

Huh?You know, this is all based and predicated on liberal policies over the last decade or more that have been, are still continuing on to this day.

I find it interesting that we're going back to where we've been at previous committees, which is, I find it fascinating that the Conservative Party seems to be suggesting we should be taking investment notes from Russia, which is a country against which we have sanctions.

Well, that's not at all what I said, Minister.I said, Minister, that we, that People and investment money is finding places like Russia and Iran and Iraq more attractive than Canada because of liberal policies.And how do you square that circle?

I'll go back to it sure sounds to me like the Conservative Party is suggesting that the best investment policies are because of liberal policies over the last decade plus that has caused the capital to flee.

Oh, man, I just love when the governmentshows that they have no factual defense at all, and they do that by immediately attacking the messenger or deflecting pro -Russian talking points.Is it really?Because the CEO of Synovus actually said that no Greenfield oil sands projects have been approved or built since 2013, and that Canadian policies have ceded high paying jobs, taxes and royalties to countries like Russia, Iran, Iraq and the United States, while failing to reduce global demand for oil by a single billion.barrel.This is on the Globe and Mail if you want to go and check it out.

He says that Canada's energy policy debate is, and I quote, myopically focused on the climate agenda.Warning that regulatory costs and a carbon tax unique to Canada are driving capital to the US and the Middle East.Is that a Russian talking point or is that just a fact?That's actually not a partisan politician or person.That is the CEO of a major Canadian energy company speaking on a public earnings call, I'd like to add, citing verifiable data.And his point isn't that Russia is good.

Will our product displace Russian?Yes.

To the contrary, that's actually just condemning a Canadian government that has officially become so hostile, their policy so bad, that they've made Russia more attractive to for a destination for energy dollars than Canada.

and that Mark Carney has told them it's never going to happen anyway.So ultimately they believe Mark Carney was telling the truth when he wrote in his book Values that he wants to keep half of our oil and gas in the ground.When he's tried to defund oil and gas and when he said carbon taxes should be bigger and broader.Liberal MPs who share that radical net zero anti -oil and gas agenda take great comfort in knowing that the Prime Minister privately agrees with them on that.

This is the partthat is just so rich.This same government, the Carney Liberals, under which Julie DeBruyssen is, in fact, the environment minister.They just signed a deal with Alberta to try to boost oil sands productions because they admit there is a problem.Then, When a CEO says your policies are problematic and drove investment away, the environment minister calls it a Russian talking point.Huh?

I'm sorry, girl, you can't have it both ways here.You really can't.Either the policies worked and there is no problem and therefore everything going on, all the noise about Alberta is irrelevant and a waste of my time.Or the problem is real and you indeed caused it, which that MOU and all the press conferences around it and even, you know, the major projects office and whatever all admit that there is a serious problem caused by this government.

Repealing the tanker ban now is part of clearing the way for the construction of that crude oil export pipeline.The ultimate goal is increasing the safe and responsible shipment of Canadian oil to our international trading partners and allies across the Asia -Pacific region.If we focus on the facts, focus on the science, and trust the experts, we can pave the way to ensuring Canada is a true global energy superpower.

And I'm sorry, if there was no problem, then why is there all of this extra work that needs to be done that is completely a waste of time and unproductive if the Liberals just removed the problem in the first place?

When we could have simply delivered the gas from Eastern Canada, where there were three terminals that the Liberals have killed.One in Newfoundland, we have our members from Newfoundland here.Jonathan.Jonathan's here.His constituents could have been working on the LNG Newfoundland and Labrador project, which would have pumped gas from the Jandark oil field to a liquid oil field.ship on the shore off to Germany.

Liberals killed it.Then there was the reversal of the Repsol terminal, which was going to take an existing import terminal, turn it into an export terminal, send it off to Europe in St. John.We have our member from St. John here, whose constituents lost out on that opportunity when the Liberals killed that.And then the third, Saguenay, the LNG Quebec project, which would have liquefied Canadian gas on the St. Lawrence, sent it off to Europe.Liberals killed all three of these projects, which, by the way, would have delivered gas in half the time it takes to get from the U .S.

Gulf Coast.And instead, those projects are now dead.And the Liberals expect us to believe that someday, over the rainbow, they're going to send ships through four continents all the way around the world to do what we could have done in a quarter of the time if they had not stood in the way.It is more headlines without deadlines, announcements without actions, illusions without reality.You know, when is the media coverage actually going to scrutinize the results of these endless announcements and look at what they actually deliver?

You know, being conservative in a country that hates you for simply existing is tough.It is tough.But at the end of the day, at least we know we can sleep easy because we always end up being proven right.

It's the darndest thing.

What we have said is that anything that may cause systemic vulnerabilities does not have to be applied by an individual service provider.I will also say We're living in a world where big tech, whether it is Apple, Google, or the range of otherother big tech companies, are operating without any type of accountability, without any type of protection of privacy.So when we talk about privacy, there's a real conversation to be had as to what that entails.So the companies that are coming forth and saying, talking about privacy, talking about privacy protection, talking about vulnerabilities, better step up and provide their path forward.to how they're protecting the privacy rights of Canadians.

That was a breathtaking performance.What a masterpiece of deflection.Gosh, that last line gets me though.It really does.Suggesting that the real privacy villains are the companies objecting to this bill.So let's just hold that up to the light.

Gary Anandasangri claims that these companies don't have any accountability and don't protect the privacy of their users.That is news to me, my goodness, because these are the exact same companies that built and maintain end -to -end encryption, which the Canadian government is trying to get them to allow access into.And those are used by hundreds of millions of people.Interesting.They've never actually built a backdoor into their own products before, which is why they're so upset about all of this.And that's why they were against this bill for that very reason.

Under oath, Google stated, and I quote, that they have never built a backdoor or other mechanism to circumvent end -to -end encryption in our products.If we say a product is encrypted, it is end -to -end encrypted.Funny enough that the minister accusing them of not protecting privacy laws and also saying you need to step up and tell us what you're doing and what your plan is.Bro, we aren't the ones who are writing a bill that would allow a secret ministerial order that companies aren't allowed to disclose to gain the access privately.of the private citizens utilizing their platforms.The definitions of this bill are so vague, according to the privacy commissioner, that they want them rewritten.

This bill has also, this isn't the first time this has come around, it's previously been scrapped for being way too invasive, and now reintroduced with many of the same problems.So let me get this straight.According to Gary Anandasangri, the companies protecting your encryption are the privacy threat, but the minister who wants secret orders to redesign those products without your knowledge or consent is the privacy champion.Yeah, that's a no from me, dog.And if there was no problems with the bill and it was just misinformation, everybody's so upset over something that they clearly don't understand because the government understands everything, Why exactly are the liberals now amending it?That doesn't make a whole lot of sense, does it?

We do have just the worst history ever in this country, though, of the government thinking that they know better than the industries of which they are trying to regulate.Prime example, Bill C -11 and C -18, the online news and online streaming acts.The government claimed they actually dismissed all of the people within the industry, saying that foreign audiences would stop seeing Canadian videos.They dismissed that.They said it was tech company fear -mongering, that you're not going to get seen in the algorithms anymore.That's not real.

That's not going to happen by us promoting Canadian content.Well, the reality is that the architectural design of global recommendation algorithms operates exactly how the creators warned.Crazy, I know.Pushing videos to geographic audiences based on a legal mandate rather than genuine individual interest caused watch times to crater.Because global algorithms interpret low watch times as an unengaging video, successful Canadian digital content creators who rely on international viewers for 90 % plus of their income saw theirglobal reach actively suppressed.

Ultimately, the law achieved the exact opposite of its stated goal for the digital age instead of helping independent Canadian creators.You know, it's crazy as I was very against those bills while I was still working in traditional media for that very reason.And I didn't even have a YouTube channel or anything like that yet.And who would have thought that the people in the industry impacted most by this were right?because they understand the industry and the government doesn't.The government does listen to lobbyists though, which is why the CBC spent so much time and money saying, yeah, we love this.

This is a great idea.I actually really wanted to show you this because it's obviously affecting me.You can go and take a look at videos of mine.You know, go take a look from the last couple of months.I've lost 50 % of my views and 50 % of my income because the creators in the industry were completely right.In 2026 there was a new tranche of CRTC mandates, decisions, regulations, whatever the heck you want to call them.

It's technically all of the above.But so from a few months ago, pre the new rollout in 2026, new viewers, which means my content's getting recommended because people are watching it, 14 percent.Today, new viewers 1 .8 % because algorithms are not recommending my content, even though if you take a look at the engagement from videos from 2025 to 2026, it's higher or on par because when people do see my content, they love it.So that is really just too bad.It's too bad that I'm not one of the regulatory priorities for Canadian content, which is legacy media, as well as diversity and inclusion.underrepresented groups including black racialized and equity deserving communities or an indigenous voice because those are the people that the platforms are now mandated to manipulate their algorithms to make sure that they have an inorganic search result each day.

viewers are not actively searching for that content.Mine gets pushed down because I don't meet the criteria and theirs all gets pushed to the top.It is disgusting.

law -abiding, trained and tested farmers, hunters, sport shooters, instead of going after gun criminals.When it comes to online crime, they choose censorship rather than shutting down perverts, pedophiles.and other predators.And now here we have another bill where they try to turn the entire tech sector into a gigantic surveillance arm of the state, which will kill many jobs and drive many of the best businesses out of our country.So it is just another example of a government that wants to control Canadians' lives.And you know they've achieved something very unique.

Normally we talk about the tension between liberty and order.They've managed to create total disorder while attacking liberty.You know, it's incredible.You see, we have total disorder in our streets.We're anti -Semitic riots everywhere, fire bombings of synagogues.We have crime and violent crime up 50 percent, extortions up 2 ,400 percent in Surrey.

And yet at the same time, they're using the heavy hand of the state to rob people of their basic liberties.You know, some people think you have to choose between liberty and order.The liberals choose neither.We believe you can have ordered liberty.

And on that note, I'll just say this now, if I decide to move out of this country so I can more effectively talk about what's actually going on here without fear of a liberal government digging through my private communication, suppressing my voice and threatening my livelihood,please don't be mad at me. I will come back as soon as that legislation is repealed and we have a government that actually respects democracy again.The fact that I'm even considering something like that right now, though, is so eye -opening.And it's just such a tell, it's such a classic story from Canada.Canada, people don't leave it.The country leaves them or in some cases literally pushes them out of the door.

And we're also making progress because our reputation as a reliable, predictable partner.has rarely been more valu where transactions are re We're blessed with many c but we have earned the mo is trust in Mark Carney's to investors in new york.

them to take it.

Our pensi some of them are here.If Although I'm not sure the Economic Club of New York needs money or has money to support.But our pension funds are amongst the most sophisticated infrastructure investors in the world, and our banks amongst the most resilient.

I don't know, maybe he's trying to make a joke.That's a weird thing to joke about, though, because he's essentially saying if you need money in a room full of people who are far wealthier than him, I imagine, And then he offers up Canadian pension funds as a source of financing, not as a selling point, but as available liquidity to American businesses.And again, you know, surely the way that he said that was meant to be a bit of a joke, right?And fair enough.I'll give him credit there for just the audience of whom he's speaking to.But I do think that instinct matters.

And this is not the first time Mark Carney has said this.He's actuallybrought up Canada's pension funds at every single major international speech he's given.He said it at Davos not long ago either.And I do think that jokes reveal instincts, and the instinct to position Canadian retirement savings as available financing for American investors in a room full of American investors.I'll add with those same funds that have been leaving Canada for years.

is just not a good look.You know they invest about 47 cents of every dollar in America because Canada isn't competitive enough for them either.So I honestly feel like bragging about those funds there while trying to court investment into Canada that just probably that wasn't a good idea.I don't think that doesn't really make us look that good.good or like we are in fact that prosperous and a good opportunity, a safe enough risk to take, right?Which may also be why Mark Carney has finally accepted reality and has gone full mega.

At a time of a global energy crisis, Canada provides the United States with reliable power, with critical minerals that help fuel American growth.99 % of U .S.natural gas imports, 85 % of electricity imports, 60 % of crude oil imports.That is mutual strength.Let's be absolutely clear.

Canada strong will help make America great again.Examples of where that's true are Legion, where we should work together and compete with the world together.

He always knew that he did.He just needed to win an election, right?The media knew that.They just liked the extra revenue they got from all the clicks every time they talk about Trump and MAGA.But wow, I knew that.every single person who has ever called me anti -Canadian, a traitor, a Trumpist, Trumpian, you're a MAGAT, you're unpatriotic, for saying exactly this, to find my comment section and leave your apology.

Please and thanks.Because this has been Donald Trump's point from day one.This has been the conservative argument from day one.A strong Canada and a strong America are good for each other.That's it.That's the whole story there.

That's about as deep as it gets.Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, the man the left held up as anti -Trump, the sophisticated adult in the room who people voted for specifically because he wasn't MAGA, who people voted for while calling everybody who wasn't him MAGA.stood in front of the Economic Club of New York and said word for word, Canada strong will help make America great again.He said it.And I would just like to offer my condolences to everyone who spent the last several months calling me anti -Canadian, a far right extremist, you're a Trump bootlicker, you foreign interference.I'm not a politician, huh?

What are you even saying right now?You're a mega sympathizer.Where are you guys right now?I didn't change.The facts never changed.The argument did not change.

The only thing that changed is that your guy finally said it out loud on a stage in Manhattan.And suddenly, it's diplomacy.When I say it, it's treason.Alrighty then.You know, none of that is a reflection of my radicalization.Quite the opposite, actually.

It's a reflection of yours.You didn't have principles.You had a team jersey.You fell into the echo chamber, not me.You became radicalized because you hated Donald Trump more than you loved your country.I've been consistent.

I've been factual.I've been Canadian this entire time, and I've taken hits for that.For many months, it has been sickening.But you know what?I did that all for this one purpose, so that when this moment came, because it was inevitably going to, I could look you in the eyes and say, I told you so.I'm Jasmine Lane.

Like, share, subscribe, comment your thoughts down below.And if you've made it this far in the episode, thank you so very much.And I'll talk to you tomorrow.I use rumble wallet.It t and makes it simple.Choo backed stable coins or e backed by real gold.

No c it connects with moon pay credit card, debit card be up and running in a mi $50, $100.It's not abou about taking that first familiar while it's still up, you can even support creators like me directly.Scan the QR code on screen or click the link in the description and download Rumble Wallet.From there, you can set up your wallet, tap buy, and you are in the game.You can go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some.