CNN STUNNED By Epstein Israel Connection

Turning now to the question of Israel in the American right and also as I mentioned previously about not just the right But also the mainstream media there was an incredible Incredible exchange between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Dana Bash over at CNN Dana Bash has been pretty vehemently pro-israel from the beginning of the October 7th Attack and has consistently defended the government and made accusations around anti-semitism on CNN. But here in particular, Marjorie Taylor Greene raises drop site news and Ryan Grimm's reporting around

Epstein and Israel connection and Dana Bash seems aghast, unaware, and this is one of the most exposing clips I've ever seen yet on the issue. Let's take a listen.

You questioned who and what country is putting so much pressure on Trump to keep the Epstein files hidden. And you included a picture about donations from pro-Israel lobbying group, AIPAC. What are you trying to say there?

Well, I think it's the question that many Americans are asking, especially when we saw information recently come out in these emails that the Oversight Committee that I serve on has released. And we saw Jeffrey Epstein with ties to Ahud Barak.

We saw him making business deals with them, also business deals that involved the Israeli government and seems to have led into their intel agencies. And I think the right question is to ask is, was Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel? And I'm proud to say I don't take money from AIPAC. I don't take money from any special group of people.

I'm just representing my district and the American people. And so that's what I was referring to.

I just want to be clear. Are you saying Israel is pushing the president of the United States to cover up the Epstein files? And what evidence do you have that that is?

No, I simply no, I simply ask. No, I simply just asked out loud. Is there a foreign government? It could be any foreign government. But is a foreign government? It could be any foreign government, but is a foreign government pushing to keep this covered up because people just don't understand the big fight against.

Well, you had AIPAC up there. It was pretty clear which government you were talking about.

That I'm questioning that government in particular and questioning any other foreign government.

Oh, it's pretty clear which government. Yeah, what's wrong with talking about that government? The evidence is straight up. It's right there. I mean, what's the problem with it? It's just so ridiculous and it's just crazy.

I really believe that the Israel-Epstein connection is one of the reasons why not just Trump, but a lot of the conservative media was so reluctant to actually go full on in the release of the Epstein files. I've actually always found it a little bit ironic. I've been at the story, you know,

the Mossad theory and all that with Epstein. It was a theory, now it's basically confirmed in terms of his acting as an agent, often on behalf of Israel, not just for Israel, many other foreign governments, but there was, you know, originally like this belief, oh, it'll just be the Democrats that are going to be implicated. Well, one of the reasons why it appears he got the sweetheart deal and more, at least

again, you know, my personal theory is because of his power broken connections all across the world, Israel, Russia, Saudi Arabia, all of these different governments, Mongolia, the Cote d'Ivoire. That's what Ryan and the full picture have revealed of the backstory behind Epstein. Money laundering, pedophilia, and all of that was—the pedophilia was like a thing that he did with, you know, at times with the global elite. But the money laundering and his connections, his ability to be a power broker, perhaps

at times intertwining the two, although there's not a ton of evidence, you know, to support that, at the very least was why he was protected at some level by some of the most richest and powerful people. So the very fact that CNN had Dana Bash acting like this is new information that they'd never even heard about before, it just shows you still the information bubble that a lot of the mainstream media and all of them are swimming in and it's just such a disgrace that Ryan and Dropshot are the only people

who are willing to report those emails. That shows like ours are the only people even willing to talk about it. And a lot of the public is just living in, they have no idea if they're not reading or paying attention.

The New York Times will talk all day long about Epstein and Trump, which is fine, I don't care. Publish it, you know, sure, it's definitely a story. Epstein and Israel is also a big story. Where are you guys? Nothing.

Yeah, Ryan Grim and Murtaza Hussein on every single byline with regard to the connections between Epstein and various Israeli figures, spies, former prime minister, dealings with foreign governments on behalf of Israel, like they're literally the only ones who are doing this reporting. And then not only are they the only ones

to do the reporting, then the mainstream press just pretends that this reporting doesn't even exist. I mean, I actually believe that Dana Bash doesn't even know that it exists. And so she's conducting this interview,

Because that's been reported out. then, you know, Epstein is just effectively about morality, which is important. Like I think the people wanna know about the sleazy behavior of politicians and global elites and the way they're all interconnected and cover for themselves.

And that has a lot to do with power. And so I don't think that you can just dismiss that on its own. But if you're not tying that in with Israel specifically, but more broadly, any other foreign governments as Marjorie Taylor Greene represents there as well, if you're not tying those pieces together,

then you're not really connecting it to the present day and the risk and the danger from this president right now and why this should be a central story and why it is really important and has immediate bearing on the conduct of our own foreign policy.

So it's just wild to see her living in this completely different universe where any sort of Israel-Epstein connection is purely like fever swamp conspiracy anti-Semitic garbage. That's how she sees it. And that's, I think, how most of the mainstream press

sees it as well. Either that or they And that's, I think, how most of the mainstream press sees it as well. Either that or they're just like, you know, themselves covering up for Israel, which is certainly possible in many cases. But a lot of it is just, they sort of see that as icky conspiracy that they're not gonna dirty

their hands with. And so she sees it as some like gotcha question to Marjorie Taylor Greene, rather than a legitimate line of inquiry and probably maybe the most legitimate line of inquiry and concern with regard to releasing the Epstein files today.

I think this is a problem. I also I want to normalize it because a lot of Democrats are very new to Epstein, right? They always they never paid attention. Now that Trump is involved, they're frothing and they're like, this is great. And I've noticed this with Ezra Klein and all of them. They see the political utility, but to them it's still icky

because Republicans have been talking about it, let's say for five years, and they kind of think, like you said, it's a conspiracy dream. Guys, the Israel thing, it's real, okay? Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it. It's not just, you know, they're like, they don't, they're so new to the story that they think anybody who's talked about that

in the past, conspiracy brain, they don't know what the, no, no, no, no, no, no. We have the evidence now. Look at what Ryan and Murtaza have reported. If I had that six months ago on Tucker Carlson well, you know, in terms of theories and speculation, it's over. Security agreements with the presidents of Mongolia, it's done.

It's military technology, Ayyub Barak, you combine that with everything that we already had in terms of a lot of the evidence, there's not even a discussion at this point in terms of acting on behalf of Israel. We need to get this into the bloodstream

of the Midas touch folks and others, because right now everything is just focused on Trump. The point, as you just said, is the connective tissue from yes, just Trump also being mentioned, but the Israel part and its potential relation to foreign policy and also of the double standard that we use in terms of counterintelligence and more

on the issue and potentially why Epstein was able to get away in the sweetheart deal with his non-prosecution agreement. That's how you connect the two sides of the coin. And unfortunately, CNNs of the world and others still wanna brand that as anti-Semitic.

No, it's just a fact. It's literally just a simple fact. I also did, if I would be remiss if I didn't show the more recent developments in conservative media. Let's put this up here on the screen. The American Conservative published this.

I love it, from Daniel Bogeslaw, who's great. New FARA filings, which are the Foreign Agent Registration Act filings, show plans to promote pro-Israel messaging at the conservative Salem media network. So, you know, people at Salem media include, they say 82 radio stations across the US,

major websites, manages high-profile websites, Town Hall, Red State, influential platforms, conserving discourse. Some of the programs that are featured include the Charlie Kirk Show, the Nadesh D'Souza Show, the Josh Hammer Show,

the Right View with Lara Trump. Well now, according to the company data, the network generates some 80 million monthly page views, 37 monthly, so it's obviously, it's influential. And so, these new FARA documents show that Salem Media may have already begun integrating

paid-for Israeli government narratives across its extensive network of platforms. This is according to this report from the American Conservative. Salem did not respond, by the way, to the American Conservative's request for comment.

The Israeli government retained Salem Media's chief strategy officer, Brad Parscale, who is the former campaign manager for Donald Trump, to advocate for Israeli interests through a $6 million financial arrangement. So this is all directly acknowledged in FARA. But it also, by the way, Dinesh D'Souza very recently has been attacking Tucker Carlson. Perhaps it's legitimate, but it does, you know, genuinely raise a question when you see vast amounts

of money like this being thrown around to Brad Parscale, who's working for Salem, and its potential influence on the conservative landscape and discourse. So, you know, that's part of the reason why all of this is so important.

Isn't Parscale also doing some, like, trying to train, like, AI chatb bots to be more pro-Israel.

I did see a story behind that.

I think he's involved with that as well.

I did see a story behind that. I definitely would like to explore it more. I hadn't seen it like fully confirmed, but this one I was like, ooh, they have them dead to rights. So yeah.

If you see people from there, I mean, look, it's a legitimate question. That's part of the reason our business is set up the way that it is, primary funded. Nobody can be coming around here saying, oh, you're getting paid by X amount interest or whatever. And if your views just happen to align with the advertisers, maybe that's just the way it is.

Like, I don't think Josh Hammer is pro-Israel because he's being paid by pro-Israel. a lot about the guy, but I don't think that's right. I think he genuinely believes it. With Dinesh, though, I really don't know, personally, and with a lot of the others there, but at the very least, it just goes to show you buying influence because they recognize, or trying to buy influence with Brad Parscale

and potentially with ads and all this other stuff, specifically because they think that they're losing the information war, that they're losing the information war,

and it's because they have a reality problem.