DAJJAL & YA'JUJ MA'JUJ SUDAH DISEKITAR KITA⁉️ INI SENJATA YANG DIPAKAI⁉️ (UST. FELIX SIAUW)

Professor Zeng, who is famous, was asked, is it the Dajjal? The answer is yes. Really?

Yes.

Confirmed by Ben Guvir, Ben Guvir, the Israeli minister, he confirmed when asked if it was true, spitting or cursing at Christians is a teaching from the Jewish religion. He said it's a tradition. According to the Christian belief,

they wait for Christ to come down again. Muslims also wait for the Messiah. And the Messiah in Muslims is Jesus. So Christians and Muslims will wait for Jesus together. Christians and Muslims will fight the Dajjal together. At least, we will wait for Jesus together.

So we will follow Jesus Jesus, right? I thought it was to strengthen the netizen's attack. Honestly, when I invited you, I wanted to discuss something else. What is it? Actually, it's about the end of the world. But there's a little thing that bothers me. Because I saw it on social media. Why is Ustad Felix so many attacks?

It's trending, right? Yes. I don't know who to follow. I know Ustad Felix is only Felix only does dakwa, if not on YouTube, Raymond, or not, that's the content of the Islamic dakwa. Suddenly there is a disinformation, hate speech,

there is a screenshot of a person who is claimed to be a truth. So actually, what's the problem, Ustaz? screenshot orang yang diklaim ini adalah sebuah kebenaran. Jadi sebenarnya kenapa masalahnya? Ya, itu juga tanda-tanda akhir zaman tuh. Tadi tanda akhir zaman itu. Coba kita dengar. Awalnya begini ceritanya. Aku melihat bahwasannya, eh aku harus cerita dulu bahwasannya, aku sudah sangat tidak asing dengan

apa ya, dengan buzzer atau dengan orang-orang yang tiba-. We know that, if we want to go back, there was a change in the way Indonesia perceived information in 2014, if I remember correctly. In 2014, it started again in 2011, because since 2008, there has been a major change in the world. Obama won with online.

So the first time the President of America, the campaign was determined by Twitter, that was 2008. Since then, Indonesia, not Twitter, social media. Since then, Indonesia has also implemented such a thing. So we see there are many agencies, then those who have a lot of accounts,

and then it's like boosting everything on the internet. Because basically there was a huge change, that 10 headlines in the world, 9 of them were taken from social media. So there was a huge shift. Oh, you see it like that? Like that. So it appeared on Twitter, there were a lot of buzzers.

And if we look at people who appear in Indonesia now, they are people who actually appear in the Twitter era. They are the ones who are vocal on Twitter and all kinds of things. Well, there are also a lot of attacks like this. So people don't like it, suddenly a lot of people appear, the speech is diverse and there was no contact at all. What do you think about the substance they are causing?

At first, I started to feel it when a lot of buzzwords came out, when I started to comment on the Board of Peace. Well, in the Board of Peace, this is the first time it was said that the DFK was that I was on the Board of Peace, it's funny, what's the name, Mr. Diansu, on the Board of Peace, at first, when President Trump was formed, he already promoted himself as Chairman for Life. The second is that he said that there are permanent members and non-permanent members. Then one of the statements there is that if you want to become a permanent member, you have to pay, in rupiah, around Rp 16.8 or Rp 17 trillion.

Around Rp 17 trillion. Yes, that's the crowd, right? Okay. That's what's stated. And many times, of course, in time, our foreign minister gave information about Rp 17 trillion because it became a very hot issue,

although not an essential issue in my opinion. That's why I personally never specifically discussed about R trillion, because in my opinion it is not essential. But the update by the Foreign Minister is first, oh, this is voluntary, not mandatory. Then for a long time it was said, we pay but we can pay, or the payment can be paid. After a while, it was said that we haven't paid yet and it's not mandatory because it's voluntary.

Then the next one is that our contribution is only 8,000 soldiers. Of course, the news is indeed changing according to the time. When we tell the news, I personally tell the news that Indonesia, if you want to be a permanent member, you have to pay 17 trillion. That is considered as the DFK. Even though the news is like that at that time. Just like when in the case of what is called DFPK again, for example. When I said that, how can it be in BOP, our president joined a peace council, he said, apart from many things that are sus,

but the worst thing in my opinion is that Gazans are not involved there. So we talk about peace, there are people who are beaten. the most severe is the non-involvement of Gaza people so we talk about peace, there are people who are beaten but the people who are beaten are not involved the people who are beaten are not involved the people who are involved are the ones who beat and the sponsors who beat I think this is really strange, it is also said by the DFK

because they say that Palestine has agreed with the Board of Peace and has entered the Board of Peace even though it is the actual DFA. Because it happens like this, Indonesians are not detailed in reading the news. They just say this, Oh, the Palestinian Authority opened an office to help the Board of Peace,

even though that's not the news. The news is, the Palestinian Authority opened a liaison office to then help speed up the Board of Peace. They didn't explain it there, they covered it in detail, that the Palestinian Authority is not Gaza.

The second is that the liaison office is an initiation, they themselves were not joined to the Board of Peace. Because the Board of Peace cannot recognize Palestine because Palestine is not a country Okay, so the Ustaz's argument which was then criticized by many people until it eventually caused an explosion

still on social media many comments on social media I'm okay with it the last one, which is also very crowded when it was said that I spread the DFK again. In the case, it said, there is an interesting posting about a briefing.

Buzzer briefing. There are several themes there. The first is because the LPDP issue has started to fade, so replace the LPDP with Anis. Don't forget to add Anabah. That's the briefing in the screenshot, right?

The second is, try to raise the fight of President Prabowo against world peace. Or try to raise how President Prabowo is the best president if you can use sad notes. Then the fourth announcement is about the MBG and how he can raise 1 million jobs. The last one is Ustaz Felix Yow, whatever, just attack. It turns out that the story I screenshotted is an analysis of people about what is trending. Not a fact?

Not a briefing.

Okay, not a fact briefing.

Correct.

Okay. Well, in that point, I actually don't have a problem. Why? Because I understand. If the briefing... Honestly, I've met with several agencies. So they said when they met me,

No hard feelings, Ustadz. We're just doing our job. That's what they said when they met me, no hard feeling, Ustaz, we're just doing our job, they said. So I'm sorry, we have about 30,000 accounts, we're just doing our job to make you look bad. But no hard feeling, Ustaz, this is not private, not for personal reasons, but this is just a job story. I said, okay, it's up to you. So you suspect that there are people like this.

I did meet the agency, and there are a lot of them. Because there are a lot of people who have studied this, about the narratives that are given directly. This person finally felt pressured. Because he was attacked. Because he was attacked.

Then he said, please, sir, to be taken down. Well, I finally put it down. Actually down, well, finally I put it down.

Okay.

Even though, actually, I understand that way, if I put it down, the problem will be bigger, and it turned out to be true. Because they do keep an eye on it, right, this is wrong, like that, yes, it's been taken down. Even though I laugh, I can just show it anytime if I want. That's actually not a fact, but an analysis from the person. What kind of narration did you use?

My narration was simple. I just wrote that the buzzer was in the briefing. Just like that? Not referring to the person's writing as proof, not like that. No, there is no proof. I'm not saying proof. I'm just saying that the essence is that this is in the public. And it turns out, if we look at it, it's a match. What's interesting is,

actually I always speak up about the government. Because for me, it's part of Ammar Maruf Nahimunkar. That's why when I talk about mining, or country, I said to you, honestly, I'm confused, why? Because that's the job of people who preach, not your job. A comedian has to talk about what's wrong with the government, right? Then where are the scholars? That's why it's normal when Professor Mahfud in some of his podcasts, he said that, right? Now there is no one in this country who is proud of Nahim Munkar.

The honors are gone. He mentioned NU, Muhammadiyah, MUI, where? I mean, don't, don't, he said, mention what? Try their Nahim Munkar. What would be better, what would Professor Mahfud say? Now Nahim Munkar is only on the podcast. Don't talk about the government. People can attack a podcast about persecution.

Now there is finally an accusation against Ustaz himself, as if Ustaz is the one who wants to...

As if, yes.

To break up. To break up. It's already starting to feel. Well, Ustaz, where do you feel like you're going? First, a leader must show one good thing. For example, President Prabowo.

What I love is that President Prabowo always says when he is advised or given input, back again in my opinion, if I become a leader, if there are people below me giving input, I should be happy because there is still communication.

What I'm worried about is when they don't want to talk anymore. Because it means they have done something bad if they don't want to talk anymore. Well, that means talking is a sign that there are still check and balances in this country. And it has to be in every place. But again, not all critics must be heard. And not all the government must be right.

At that point, check and balances must be done and must be corrected. Is this right or not? Is this honest or not? Now what I want to make with the government, the narrative is that the government is still good. The government must be sincere. The government must know more than you and all kinds of things, so there is no possibility of correction, because they are definitely right, but it turns out that it doesn't happen like that. So what I want to say is actually a way to be a healthy country.

Oh, from the POV, it's a hassle, it should be like that. We are Indonesian citizens, we see something that is not good. If it's not a matter of mine, of course we will never criticize. But if it's something we control, something we know, we can talk about it. I believe that our president is working hard for our country. It means there is a plus or minus where we don't too much to see from the bad side. We must also look at the good side.

But sometimes the narration is a bit disturbing on social media because there is one side busy criticizing the bad ones, while the other side is busy defending the good ones.

Right.

You feel it, right?

Right.

So I mean, if I want to be objective, this one person says there is a positive, there is a negative, we are discussing. Right. I mean, it's like that, right? The core of the discussion must be opened. That's what we love, right? There are some people when observing some things that have happened lately, especially since the reign of Panji,

it was revealed that the country was like taking care of people who were like defenders but were not responsible. So there are people who are like taking advantage of their will, but they are silenced by the government. So like this, for example, I want to represent Densu, I want to say that you are all badjigur, for example, to create a feeling, but Mas Densu is not clarifying, this is not part of me, so it's like disposable, I mean.

Oh, so yes, yes, yes.

This is what actually causes tension, which then causes division and all kinds of things, because the division narrative is like that, this is wrong, this is definitely true. Even though what we say is not like that. What we always compare is,

is there no time to consider, for example, policies? This is an example of BOP. The one who criticized BOP is not just me. There are some other people who criticized you. Last time, Nisuf lost, criticizing BOP and also the decisions that were taken when in Davos and so on. In my opinion, that's what a good countryman is, or simply, in the family, a husband is impossible, he must be right, right?

Although it's true, a wife appreciates her husband is tired of working abroad, or actually there are a lot of jobs that have to be taken, he has a lot of responsibilities. But when he doesn't care and doesn't talk, it's actually wrong. The important thing is actually good communication, in my opinion. Open the communication genre like what. That's what should be in Indonesia.

That being different doesn't mean hating. We become a debate, right? I mean, if you don't meet him, it's okay. Yes, I'm not supporting Mr. Liadin.

True.

As I said, for example, when MUI approves or at least waits for Mr. Prabowo's DOP, I say yes, in Islam, it's simple. If they have made a decision and it is the ulama who makes the decision and he has met the SOP standards that are already in Islam, then there are only two possibilities, good and better. So there is nothing wrong actually. And I said, yes, permission, I am different from MUI. It means we can't blame, oh, this MUI must have been influenced by Zionists.

We never said that. I never even said, oh, this is Mr. Prabowo, Zionist. I never said that either. But if, for example, Mr. Prabowo decides to stay in the WOP, then what can we do? We can't, right? Does that make me want to curse? No, you can't.

Does that make me want to make a move to make violence? You can't either. But I think the delivery of an opinion is a sign of love. As long as it's in the corridor that is allowed. Just the language and the way. Don't let the way eventually cause more disinformation and slander and hatred. Agreed. Because yesterday, for example, I was attacked too.

I don't consider it an attack. I consider it an intervention. Because at that time, it was Mrs. Connie's law. Mrs. Connie then gave a statement. I don't know that statement. I asked the time.

About the DOP? No, about the Israeli army saying that Indonesia is better to just take care of your problem. Don't mix our affairs. There are already people in Indonesia. The point is And that information was obtained from sources that turned out to be invalid, which was then clarified by Bukhoni.

Then people attacked me and Bukhoni, of course. Then I said, oh, there is misinformation. Well, it's been sorted out. I agree. It's been sorted out. I agree. It's been sorted out. And I sort it out.

What I'm confused about is that they see me as someone else, which Denzu is afraid of. Denzu is like, I'm not him, I'm Denny. So if there is something wrong, I am Denny who usually will straighten it. Sure. That's me Denny, because I'm not like others. Not him, huh?

Then I was claimed that, wow, Densu believes in Mrs. Connie.

Densu believes in Ustaz Felix. Huh?

Why should I believe? I invite Narasumber, right? Right. If the matter of trust is not, I will cross-check first. Right. If it's a matter of trust or not, I'll cross-check first. Because this is what the source says. I'm also a voter, I listen. We as people are looking for information, right?

Like Ustad Felix said, I'm sorry Ustad, I'm just being honest. I listen. Okay, I'll check Ustad Felix's statement. Whether it's data or not, what it is or not. And as humans, we are also quite gentle. If we have wrong data, we apologize. The substance is there.

But the substance is going to... I want to be monitored. Then I want to be... This is social media, how come it's like this? That's what I mean. So people now can't be human.

Because they think like this. Why are we humans? Because the angels are right. And the devil, the devil is wrong. So we are humans who can be right and wrong. It means that if we want to be ready to be human,

I think the most important thing is dialogue. That's it. Because in the Quran, the devil doesn't want to have a dialogue. The devil doesn't want to have a dialogue? He doesn't want to. So when Allah said that, I will create man as a caliph on earth.

At that time, the caliph was the devil and the jinn. When he heard that, the only one who wanted to talk was the angel. Because the angel was right, right? Allah told him. The angel asked, why did you make man as a caliph on earth?

He likes to kill, people he will spill blood, while the devil is silent, right? In the end, when asked to prostrate, he doesn't want to. The dialogue is important because the dialogue is the character of humans. Yes, from the dialogue, we can find the feeling of frustration that we can pour on the table, then we choose.

It's actually a process of democracy, a process of life, right? It's the same as when I criticized Dede Korbuzan, for example. I said, uncle, this shouldn't be like this, it shouldn't be like this, it should be like this, and so on. In the end, after we met, we had a dialogue, it turned out that we have a lot of similarities. I mean, I'm sure there's no one who they're doing evil because they're sure they're doing evil. Or doing wrong, because they're sure they're the wrong or evil people. What I'm sure of is, there could be someone who doesn't know.

Unconscious. It means he's unconscious.

Eating people's words.

Lying and all kinds of things. Eating people's information. of his hallucinations. Right. That's the importance of us being kind to each other, right? Well, that's the importance of people discussing again. So as long as there is a desire to discuss, I think there is no problem. But if it's already in the beginning, it's already in the judgment, right?

I learned a lot in the dakwah that I one of those people who had a lot of judgment to people. And I understand that judgment will never be able to lead people to goodness, even though he wants to do good. Yes, who wants to be better if we haven't been judged? That's why we want to open up the room for discussion as big as possible, far from judgment. For example, in the case of President Prabu, I said that I was very amazed when he gave a speech at the PBB for the first time.

When he was in office, he gave a speech at the PBB, it was really cool. The one that became a note is only the last 5 minutes. But it's cool, I admit it's firm, polite and has a statement. It's very extraordinary, that's what I expect from our president, why? because we should be appreciated like that, just when he opens one thing, for example, when there are things we don't know if we are being heard or not, we give input.

Just like MBG, right? That MBG is a good program, of course. But is it correct? Then we will tell them, right? Where is the incorrect, where is the good, and the discussion must be open.

From here I can see, the feeling of Ustaz Felix himself

about what is happening now is very high. That's a duty. Because, Mas Jensu, Allah will not only ask for the responsibility of the wrongdoer, but also the one who is silent when he knows it is wrong. Back to what we said earlier,

that the wrongdoer is not necessarily evil. It could be that he is lazy, he is not certain, he is evil. He can be lazy, he can be unconscious, he can be unaware. Therefore, the obligation of people who know is to inform the wrongdoer.

True.

And the Prophet's words are meant by, help your brother, either in a state of being oppressed or in a state of being oppressed. So you have to be helped. But I'm confused like this, Ustaz. For example, I made a mistake. There are people whose character is that if they make a mistake, they don't want to admit it.

Some people run away, some people use rhetoric, and so on. I take an example, I made a mistake, I immediately, Oh yeah, where's the mistake? Okay, I fix it. When I make a fix, I'm criticized.

A lot. I've experienced it. I'm confused. I mean, if I'm the one, my mental is probably... Normal. I think...

I pity those people. The one who has a weak mental. When they want to change, why are they getting more and more angry? When they want to do the right thing, why are they saying bad things about them? True. So what do you expect? Yes. I'm confused.

I've experienced it and so has my friend. My friend even drank sedative. He was stressed? He was stressed because of the sedative. Because he was framed, right? Because, again, what's scary is framed. Because we're not prepared when we see people change.

You know what? Sometimes we're not like religious people, but like fanatic football fans. For example, I'm an MU. I lost to MU every time. Now, it's not bad. Then, suddenly I said, I want to be Liverpool's fan.

What do you think Liverpool fans would say? It's impossible for them to say, Masya Allah. They would say, you go to another place. I don't accept you here.

I don't like you. He wanted to change, but he made a mistake. For example, I once experienced this. A few years ago, in 2001 or 2022, I was asked in the mosque, I was filling up from morning to night,

I was so tired, and I was asked, where was Jesus actually born? That's the problem. As a Catholic, in elementary school, we were taught that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, in the womb of a woman. We already knew that,

but because of slip of tongue, in my head head I explained that Jesus is a Nazarene.

Okay.

Because Jesus is a Nazarene. But he was born in Bethlehem. I said, Jesus was born in Nazareth.

Oh, slip of tongue.

I didn't realize it at all. Sometimes we can be like that. The video has been published for a while, suddenly I suddenly laughed at people who often debate about religion. They immediately said, I'm stupid, I don't understand this, this is a strange lesson. I said, Astaghfirullahaladzim. I tried to clarify on one of the accounts that I uploaded for the first time.

I said, I'm sorry, I don't want to tell you anything, but this is a slip of the tongue. And I don't want to be understood either, but I was misunderstood, but I said it was wrong. Oh, there's this, gentle. Gentle, I was wrong. And I prayed, hopefully in the future I can be better. Wow, everything is a lie underneath. That's why I just closed your account. That's why I don't have to talk if I don't understand.

Yes, everything got worse, like we said earlier. So we're confused. But your words there, this is apologizing. Apologize, this is still wrong. We want to apologize, admit our mistakes, there's no reason, we'll be better in the future. But what comes up is a compliment. So we can see that people are not ready when people want to change.

Why is that? Simple, because the initial intention when talking like that is not to improve, but to feel better. Feeling better. So there are two ways to feel better. The first is to have an achievement. The second is to feel better. So there are two ways to feel better. The first is to have an achievement. The second is to humble others.

By humbling others, you become like above. So I said, okay, it means that their intention at first is not to improve, but to just spit it out. But sometimes it triggers us. I mean, we already have a good intention, but in the end our intention is not good. Sometimes I do things that I have already humbled.

I suddenly said, I was a dog. Just once? When I was a dog, he ran. So I thought, oh, this is how humans should be. But what I did, in the context of good intentions, it became bad. I see that I go back to our intentions.

If so, we have to introspect our intentions personally. It should be like that. Because our intentions at first, we initially commented or criticized or advised, we want to make amends. It means that if there is a remedy, we are happy. But when, for example, our intentions are wrong,

then we are scolded by people, then we curse back again, I think it's not right. Because there is one thing that I keep, I really keep that we can't be verbally abusive. Although the word dog is not always abusive. Yes, sometimes for fun, but it depends on the context. For example, I often talk to people about that. Have you ever seen Panji talking to Dede Corbuzier?

There is a podcast that all the dogs come out. Yes, a lot of dogs. But yes, a lot of dogs. But they are just chill. Yes, both of them are doggy. But they are just fine. At that point, I said, that's the context for the argument at the right time.

But the audience doesn't all understand the context for the argument at the right time. But the audience doesn't understand the context. It's dangerous when it's abusive. I think if it happens like that, and people misunderstand even though we've asked for it, it's normal. Maybe it's a cost,

rather than what we want to start with. One more thing, we're educating people. Educating people about how the difference of opinion becomes something that should not cause hatred. And division. And division.

We are educating people, so when we educate people, we have to set an example like that.

Yes, and this is very difficult now.

Very, because of the polarization. From there, can we categorize it as sign of the end of times? Very. Because people are rebellious, so there is a word of honor. Oh, the signs are rebellious, word of honor. Good people are called evil, bad people are called good. Oh, it's back and forth.

People who like war say they want peace. Okay, is there? Sorry, I'll say it. Trump said that he wanted to leave his legacy after he died. He wanted to be remembered as a peaceful person. But in his speech,

he attacked people 7 times in 2025. So it's not synchronized. 7 countries were attacked by him. And the Washington Post in 2021, if I'm not mistaken, said that Trump lied 22 times per hour.

Oh, that's the data? Yes, in 2021, before he was in office for the second time. He did a lot of wrong narrations or wrong facts. That's 22 per hour. So he did it. There's data later. Okay, this is credible, right?

Don't be so...

Don't be so not credible.

I'm sorry if there's something that's not right. Sure, just go to the DFK. Don't tell me to take down, take down. I'll just clarify it later. Just admit it to the DFK.

Yes, like that.

The second is, Netanyahu said that we seek peace. He said, and we are the people who consistently spread peace in the Middle East. The proof is the same, right? When the Board of Peace, they said the Peace Treaty, but at the same time we know that the US sent 1,800 Mk-84 missiles to destroy Gaza.

And at the same time, hundreds of trillions were sent to Israel in the form of war weapons. So from day one, when it happened on October 7, the US sent military aid to Israel. And Israel used it mostly to bomb people. When the Board of Peace was created, imagine, ceasefire since then, then it was made in Gaza,

there were 1,500 more violations. Well, this means that people said he was peaceful, but he was actually a destroyer. People say he's a destroyer, but he's actually the one who made peace. There are many words of insults everywhere. It's a real insult. People insult with explicit words. It also includes abstain from false, open, and so on.

There are many things that we think, why is the world like this? It's just an opener. Oh, that means there are already signs, Masun. Opener, anti-class. Interesting, this is interesting, Masun, try to imagine, maybe not many people want to show it, but later it depends on whether Mas Denzo wants to show it or not.

Sure.

Israel is openly stated that they are a nation or a Jew, a nation that is waiting for the Messiah. That's what Israel said. They are waiting for the Messiah, who will return, right? Because they don't recognize Jesus as the Messiah. That's what I meant.

The second premise is that Israel does not recognize Jesus as the Messiah. And they say that he is a false messiah. So they don't want to accept him. But they are waiting for someone else besides Jesus. The fact is that Christians are waiting for the Messiah. That's right. Christians are waiting for the Messiah.

Jesus.

Jesus. So that they can come back. Muslims are also waiting for the Messiah. Isa. Isa. wait for the Messiah Jesus Wait for the Messiah So, at this point, Muslims and Christians

Wait for the same Messiah I told my Christian friends If Jesus comes, we all follow him

How? Wait a minute

Wait a minute We'll clean up We'll clean up. According to the Christian belief, they are waiting for Christ to come down again. They say the second coming. Muslims also wait for the Messiah.

And Imam Mahdi. One timeline. And the Messiah in world is Jesus. Jesus. So, Christians and Muslims are both waiting for Jesus. Oh, so it's the same person. The same person. So, if Jesus really comes down,

I told my Christian friends, we will all follow Jesus. Right?

Of course.

We are waiting. This is the end of times. And one of the things Jesus did was to kill the DFK.

Yes, that's one of the things I heard.

Yes, with whatever method, either by Christ or by Muslims. Those are the signs of the end of times. I honestly don't want to believe it, because I hope I'm a logical person.

But why is it too much coincidence? I'm like this, I honestly don't want to believe it, because I hope I'm a good fit.

But why too much coincidence? Coincidence? Coincidence, why does it all fit? For example, there were many things, okay, that's probably common. But there is one hadith that I often repeat in various sharing. Rasul said that one of the signs of the end of times is the big huruhara in Syam.

Syam is now Syria. Most of Syria. There are many others, but okay. Syria. There are many events in Syam. And it will be pacified by someone who holds the troops.

If he is a little 10,000, if he is a lot 15,000. Meaning between 10,000 and 15,000. Peace there. Then after he pacified everything, he will be replaced by a young man from Bani Hashim, the descendant of the Messenger of Allah.

And we think, is the descendant of the Messenger of Allah Imam Mahdi? And it turns out now, when the one who pacified Syria, who has a force of 10,000 to 15,000, the president now, when interviewed, his force was 14,000. That means it's starting's getting closer, right? There are those who are waiting for the Messiah, there are those who are waiting for the Messiah too. There are cases like this.

I'm nervous.

And in the Quran, Allah says, we have discussed it, but now it makes sense. Later, your best friend will be a Christian Christian, and the enemy will be the most difficult for you, the Jews.

Eh, really?

This is the Jews. Eh, really? This is the Qur'an. At that time I was like, oh, I thought, yes, too. Well, all this time we've been busy, finally we're friends, right? It's like this, in my opinion, what makes us busy is not Christians or Muslims, but actually in the fight with the Jews.

This is an analogy, right? An analogy, my belief. Yes, My belief. My belief. Why? Because now, if we look at it, it turns out it has been proven that institutions through AIPAC

or anything else, fund churches to promote that Israel which is now there, modern Israel is Israel that is included in the Bible. Is there such a thing? There is. Please look for the data.

Is there data? Credible. I Please look for the data. Is there such a thing? Yes. It's credible. It's very credible. I'm like this now, asking this question. That's right. Because every church gets funds in America. And we already know what the AIPAC lobby is like. And the AIPAC lobby ultimately directs Christians to believe that the modern Israel is Israel itself.

In the Bible, which is prayed by Abraham. But what is clear, if we look at it from this point of view, now the biggest sponsor of Israel is Christian countries. Even though if asked theologically, for Jews, is Jesus Messiah? As far as I know, they don't admit it.

And they have openly stated it. There is a Rabbi in New York who even said that all Christians should be killed. And I often see, I don't know if the information is complete or not, the Jews, if they see Jesus' cross,

they are humiliated. Or see Christians who carry the name of Jesus, they are often done roughly. The last time Ben-Guvir confirmed, the finance minister, Ben-Guvir, the Israeli minister, he confirmed when asked if it was true, spitting or mocking Christians is a lesson from the Jewish religion. He said it's a tradition.

Tradition?

It's a tradition. Why said it's a tradition. Tradition? It's a tradition. Why is that tradition possible? They said this, interestingly, I'm sorry, they said Islam, according to their rabbis, Islam and Judaism are closer in theology.

I often hear that. Because Islam and Judaism are monotheism, he said. But Christians say he's not monotheism anymore. They are syriac, they say. So it must be avoided when meeting, it must be remembered that it is not a true religion. But back again, it is released. So that's it.

Well, that means it was argued, finally. Finally, hatred between Christians and Muslims was aroused. The funny thing is that Christians who hate Muslims don't even know that Jesus is from Palestine. Oh really? Let's see, there's one, and this is also valid, you can look for it. This is not a DFK, right?

No, no, no.

If I'm in DFK, I immediately ask God for forgiveness before asking for forgiveness. And if you're wrong, be gentle. Sure, if I'm wrong, I'll apologize. So there's a meme that was made from stand-up comedy. This stand-up comedian is a Christian and he is an Arab.

Okay.

And we know that it is very common in the Arab world. Christians and Arabs are very common in the Arab world.

Yes.

He came to America and was asked, Where are you from? I'm from Lebanon. Sorry, he said he was from Palestine.

From Palestine.

I'm from Palestine, he said. Oh, so you're Muslim? No, I'm not Muslim. I'm Christian. No way, you can't be Christian. Why? You're Muslim. Yes. I'm not Muslim, I'm Christian.

You're Arab. Yes, but I'm Christian. No way, Arab is Muslim.

No, I'm Christian.

No way, there's no Christian there. He said, if you want to forget, I just want to let you know that there is a very famous figure in the Christian world. His name is Jesus. He's from Palestine. From Palestine? Jesus is from Palestine. What's the logic, Ustaz?

Jesus was born in Bethlehem. Bethlehem. Bethlehem, and then he grew up in Nazareth. We follow the Christian history. In that time, the area was called Judea. Judea. But before Judea, the area was called Palestine.

Because the people who lived there were called the Peleset. That's why after the Nati 135, after the great rebellion by the Jews, King Hadrian expelled the Jews from there, then changed the city of Jerusalem to Elia, Elia Capitolina, and changed the area to Syria-Palestine. So, the name Palestine was first, then later left by the Jews, along with Judea. After Judea, it returned to Syria, Palestine.

Okay, hold on. Is this just one POV about the geographic or is there another POV? Because the area that I mentioned earlier, the earliest area before Abraham moved there, was called Canaan. Canaan is a combination of the Peleseleset and the people of the same place.

This is a history science. History. It can be tracked after the Bronze Age. So after the Bronze Age, there were people called the Seamen, or known as Peleset, who then occupied that area. Then when they occupied that area, they assimilated with the original people there, the Canaanites,

so it was called Palestine. Oh, from there. This is not assumed, if not. Bronze Age is minus 6500, later you can find out. I just found out. I have discussed this on the channel of Sepulang Sekolah.

But I'll find out later. You can. on his channel, Sepulang Sekolah. But I'll look for it first. Sure. Rather than later I'm told I'm not looking for it. Actually, I'm looking for it. Right?

It's just that I have to...

But sometimes there are people who don't want to know. Yes, that's right. But back again, if it's like this, there can be other POVs. It can be. So I can tell the POV that I'm from, what was the name of the area before Abraham was called Canaan.

Abraham came there, his name was still Canaan, after that, he was then called by Daud and all kinds of things, so he became a Jew. Yes, this is based on the historical POV from Ustaz Felix, right? Correct. Okay, but maybe there are those who have other POVs. But the one that cannot be denied is Jesus from there. That cannot be denied? It cannot be denied, whatever his name is from there. Whether his name is Palestine, whether his name is Judea,

it's still that area. Bethlehem. I have a slightly tricky question. Actually, I'm curious about Yajus-Majus. Because if I read the narratives, news news, the information, or all the interpretations that I see, as if what I get is a kind of nation or tribe that is scary. Then he's like a bump on a wall. Then he's been alive for a long time. There is no human being who has been alive for a long time.

What is this? Well, there are a lot of POVs in the discussion. Yes, there are a lot of POVs. But again, I can't guess which one is right. Okay. What we can explain is something that we can discuss now, which is clear when it happens, then we will know what it is like. Okay. But, have you ever watched Hollywood movies, Netflix, and all that? It talks a lot about a nation whose characteristics are like Yajus and Majus.

Chirichiri?

The characteristics. Or in the Bible, if we read, there are Gog and Magog. Gog and Magog. It's exactly the same as Juz and Majuz. It means the same. Gog and Magog is told in a place that has people in quotation marks,

as described. Yes, the characteristics. For example, in the movie, Lord of the Rings, there is Ogre. Ogre has the same characteristics. People, not people, but unclear creatures.

Sadistic, slaught slaughter, and all that in the movie what is it called what is it called on Netflix the war between kingdoms, what is it called

Game of Thrones there are Northmen there are people with white skin then attack the barbarians that's the same

the characteristics are the same they attack from the north, from the mountain then if we look again in history there is a group of people Northmen too

Vikings that's Northmen Atiladahan I'm curious where the end is. All of this is... Yeah, the characteristics. So people have understood that

the North people are very, very scary. North. Okay, so this is the first reason I gave. Now we enter the Quran. In the Quran, the story of Yajus and Majus cannot be separated from Zulkarnain. We are still confused about who he is. There are many opinions.

But what is clear is that Zulkarnain was given such great power. He was a king with such a large army and had the power to be the world's admin at that time. So Trump was at that time. But he didn't make the peace board, did he? Not yet. Because he was already lonely enough. So when he went to the east, he met people. He went to the west, he met people.

Then he went to the middle, between the two mountains. There he got a group of humans who asked for help. He asked for help, this is Yajud Ba'adzus, it causes damage everywhere, can you help us? Then Zulqarnain said, okay, but you help me, take it, then the iron bars and all kinds of things, immediately poured between the two mountains until Yajud Bajus was left. According to one of the scholars, one of the stories, the one who was left was called Turki. The one who was left behind is called Turkey. The one who is left behind is called Turkey.

The original word in Arabic is Taroka Yatruku, which means to leave. This is an interpretation. Interpretation. More precisely, a comment. Comment. Comment on this verse.

Okay. So, one of them is Turkey. That's why when people talk about Yajud and Majud, they talk about their genealogy or ethnicity, they explain that their ethnicity is Yavitic. Because in the Bible, we know that the boss, Nuh, has three children, Sam, Ham, and Yavid. Sam gave birth to a descendant named Semit. That's why the Jews are called Semit.

We are called anti-Semit. How are we anti-Semit? The Arabs are also Semit. Prophet Muhammad is Semit. All the descendants of prophets are mostly Semites. Semites, Hamid, and Yafetik. Yafetik are the people of the Northmen, the one I gave the background earlier.

They were given the territory on the upper side. So, Attila the Hun, Mongols, Chinese, Kitani, you know. So we are potentially becoming more and more advanced, that's the conclusion.

We are the candidates.

That's DFK. No are the candidates. That's DFK. No, no, no. That's not certain yet. But we have a potential. This is a rhetorical discussion. So it's clear. Conspiracy is conspired.

So the word neophytic descent, more complete is the descent of neophytic which later actually there is one part just certain than the descent of neophytic. That's Yajus and Majus. That is the first opinion.

Because the first opinion is that the Prophet Adam once spoke to Allah. And Allah said, Your descendants are among a thousand people, only one of them entered heaven. Nine out of nine entered hell. Adam cried,

How can there be so many? How can my descendants are so many? Allah said, 999 is Yajud and Majud. So he is human, right? Bani Adam, right? Adam's descendants.

According to this hadith, of course. But back again, the hadith is not like the Quran. If the Quran is 100% true and can't be doubted. But if it's a hadith, it could be that could be other interpretations. Yes, if it's a hadith, there are several interpretations.

Or it could be incorrect. Yes, yes. There are some that are correct, some that are not. There is a possibility, not incorrect. There is a possibility that it is not correct. Or the interpretation is not 100% correct. That's the first opinion.

There are opinions that ... Sorry, I'll explain it to you. But the first opinion, the difficulty was earlier. Which area on this planet has not been explored? We have seen the average, except for the oceans. The oceans have not been explored. So how is it possible if there are so many people ... That we don't know.

If there are 2 billion people now, it means there are 999 times 2 billion. And social media is everywhere, it's impossible not to be known. Right, how can there be people who are still trapped? Right. So there is another theory that was made, back to the theory, not yet true.

The theory is, there may be layers under the ground where there are Yajus and Majus, which I don't prefer to go there, but there is a theory, I just want to say. Too illogical, right? Right, that's why I don't prefer it. There are others who say that they are under the sea. I don't prefer that either. It's a bit less. Like there is Atlantis or something.

Yes, yes. Well, that means that's the first theory. Well, here's the second theory. There is, sorry, there is a second discussion. The second discussion is like this. Ya'juj and Ma'juj are... Ya'juj can be said to be influential. Because from the word, it is active. Ma'juj is the one who is influenced.

Like for example, Sujud means... Sajid is the person. Masjud is the one who is sujud. It means passive, active and passive. It means there is an influencer and there are influencers and followers. Eh, eh, why are you being sarcastic?

Yajus is the influencer, and Majus is the followers. It means that it can be anyone among us who follows influencers with the same characteristics as before, is actually Majus. It can be...

All of us now. Yes, yes, yes. It can be anyone from the past to the present, it is influenced by Jesus and Moses. For example, the work of Jesus and Moses is really brutal, really doesn't care what many people need.

Well, if we look at it now, there is already an opener. Oh, I mean, the logic fits there. The logic fits there. Back again, we don't know which one is right, but the logic can be there because it's already visible. Now I want to ask, is there anyone who can stop America? No. Not even America itself.

What Trump wants to say, America can't do anything. For example, when Trump attacked Iran, everyone said this is an international law violation. But who can stop America? This is the first time I've heard of this kind of PLP. Then my brain immediately went to everywhere. Because it's like there's a puzzle that's stuck.

But it's like a conspiracy, don't believe it either. I agree. I really hope not. But as humans, we still need an explanation. We need to think, but don't accuse. Right, don't make sure.

Yes.

Because as humans, we can only interpret it. This is what is happening now, like 71,000 minimal who died in Gaza, or in Sudan, or in other conflict areas. It's the same, human? Human life is so cheap. I mean,

so, is this also meant by Yajus and Majus? The answer is very possible. Although the scholars still argue that the origin of Dajjal, Yajus and Majus are humans.

What they believe, the mainstream is what they believe. It should be human sociological, right? But how he works and what he aims for is what becomes the substance, right? That's why the second theory, sorry, the second discussion is logical.

I'm more to, yes, maybe all this time we've been going forward, when we live without a purpose, when we follow in quotes. Yes, although it is said that the global elite conspiracy elite conspiracy, or there is, but what we see is that there is something like Epson Files, which is so big, and it is said that it is not just one, it is only one hub, among other hubs, like Didi and all that, it is only one hub, it is also among the hubs, it turns out there is. I mean, they're not not coordinating. That's one of the end of the times. The weapon is information. Right.

That's why it's interesting. Do you know what the Prophet said? When you meet with Dajjal, because for us, we have explained, Dajjal is an information technician. He can make everything confusing.

And AI has already done that. Oh, before I come here, I want to tell you a story. The famous professor Jiang was asked, Is AI Dajjal? The answer is yes.

Really?

Yes.

The interviewer was called Seniko. Seniko is a famous rapper. Not Dave Keney, right? Yes, please understand. Seniko is a rapper Not Dave K Please understand Because it's true, we all have to use data So that's it

This is a Dian Sastro's watch Professor Jiang And I watched it before it was crowded when Dian Sastro was discussed It's really scary Since then we have discussed, 30% has become real Yes, because some say from Professor Jiang's statement, 30% of it is already happening.

And he was asked, is AI a devil or not? The answer is yes, he said. Is AI an antichrist? He said yes.

Who made AI?

I think AI is actually not bad. But again, the information is never bad. But the one who uses this information for framing is the bad one. That's why I asked, who made AI? If AI, if from the very beginning, the one who made AI was actually humans Humans from which group?

If AI is well known, the first one who made it was Alan Turing

Alan Turing?

Computer, right? The first computer was made by Alan Turing But to make it possible for Alan Turing to make a computer that eventually became a calculator, he made a computer as big as a house to be able to calculate the calculator, that's the first AI. Yes, but I know there is a group who are very good at IP in this world. If not, why did Israel invest in GPT?

And Israel, Netanyahu openly stated when he met with influencers in New York, in America, he openly stated that the main war we of us now is in social media. After that, Oracle bought TikTok, right? Yes, it's quite mind-blowing, our conversation today. Because this is, in my opinion, one of the speeches where we finally opened another speech.

But my hope is not to accuse, right? Well, that's right, we just give data. Yes, this is just material, data. This is just the material. The material hasn't necessarily happened yet. I hope not. I hope not.

But the signs are there. There are more and more. What I want to finish is, the Prophet said when you met Dajjal, the Prophet said, read the first 10 verses of Surat Al-Kahfi.

What is that?

The first 10 verses are about how we handle misinformation. That is, by knowing what information is correct. That is the Qur'an. Christians and Muslims will fight the Dajjal together, actually. At least the fact is, we are waiting for Jesus together. So we are together.

Will follow Jesus, right? Salam first. Oh, of course. So we are united against We will follow Jesus, right? Salamun! So we are united against Dajjal!

Thank you so much! Thank you so much! That was fun!