JD Vance KICKED OFF show for DISGUSTING lying

Vice President J.D. Vance got himself kicked off of George Stephanopoulos show. He was repeatedly asked, did Tom Homan take the 50000 dollars and J.D. Vance delivering really a clinic in disinformation and how not to answer a question? He's doing all the things that we've studied before. This is this is like an an academically instructive example. He tries to answer a question that isn't the one that was asked.

He plays semantics games. He attacks the interviewer. He attacks the entire institution and he attacks the media more broadly. And one of JD's weaknesses that I think you'll see here is that he tries to act a little too slick when he does this stuff and he comes off as too patronizing. Take a look at this. This this is this is a just I don't know that there's a better example.

The White House borders are Tom Homan was recorded on an FBI surveillance tape in September 2024, accepting 50000 dollars in cash. Did he keep that money or give it back?

George, you've covered the story ad nauseum. Tom Holman did not take a bribe.

It's now remember the question was, did he take the money or give it back? Answer. He didn't take a bribe. Now we are talking about a distinction that is about whether the money counts as a bribe. This is a different question than the one that George asked.

A ridiculous smear. And the reason you guys are going after Tom Homan so aggressively is because he's doing the job of enforcing the law. I think it's really preposterous. I know, Tom, I think that he's a good man. He gets death threats.

He gets attacked. He gets constantly threatened by people because he has the audacity to one who enforced the country's immigration.

Now he's doing a pivot. So first is answer a different question than the one asked, then pivot to something different.

I think that it would be a much more interesting story about why is it that Tom Homan, who is simply enforcing American's immigration laws, is getting constantly harassed and threatened to the point of death threats. That's a much more interesting question that I think journalists should focus on. We can agree to disagree on that.

Well, you said he didn't take a bribe, but I'm not sure you answered the question. Are you saying that he did not accept the $50,000?

George, this story has been covered ad nauseum. He did not take a bribe. Did he accept $50,000? I'm sure that in the course of Tom Homan's life, he has been paid more than $50,000 for services.

Notice that again, he's answering a question that wasn't asked. Has he accepted money for services? The question is, did he accept the 50,000 at issue here on camera on recording that the FBI was investigating?

The question is, did he do something illegal? And there's absolutely no evidence that Tom Holmes has ever taken a different question. I'm asking you, why is working in the administration?

I'm asking you, did he accept the $50,000 that was caught on the surveillance? Did he accept that $50,000 or not?

George, I don't know what you're talking about. Did accept that $50,000 or not?

George, I don't know what you're talking about. Did he accept $50,000 for what?

Next is feign confusion.

It was recorded on an audio tape in September 2024, an FBI surveillance tape, accepting $50,000 in cash. Did he keep that money?

Accepting $50,000 for doing what, George? I'm not even sure I understand the question. Is it a crime? Even the far left media like yourself. So I'm actually not.

Now. Now he's starting to attack George. That's not. This is now part four of this.

Sure. What the precise question is, did he accept $50,000? Honestly, George, I don't know the answer to that question. What I do know is that he didn't violate a crime.

If you don't know what he did, how do you know it wasn't a crime?

So you don't what was caught on the tape. You're saying right now you don't know whether or not he kept that money. I don't know what tape you're referring to, George. I saw media reports that Tom Homan accepted a bribe. There's no evidence of that. And here's George, why fewer and fewer people watch your program and why you're losing credibility, because you're talking for now five minutes with the vice president, the United States.

And of course, it's been two and a half minutes. But importantly, the reason it's going on this long is J.D. Vance won't answer the question. This is a classic shift. The blame not I won't answer a simple question five times. You won't stop asking me about it.

About this story regarding Tom home and a story that I've read about, but I don't even know the video that you're talking about. Meanwhile, low income women can't get food because the Democrats and Chuck Schumer have shut down the government. Right now, we're trying to figure out how to pay our troops because Chuck Schumer has shut down the government.

You are focused on a bogus story. You're insinuating criminal wrongdoing against a guy who has done nothing wrong.

And of course, George is not insinuating anything. He's just trying to figure out, do you acknowledge that he took the money instead of focusing

on the fact that our country is struggling because our government shut down? Let's talk about the real issues, George. I think the American people would benefit much more from that than from you going down some weird left-wing rabbit hole where the facts clearly show that Tom Homan didn't engage in any criminal wrongdoing.

It's not a weird left-wing rabbit hole. I didn't insinuate anything. I asked you whether Tom Homan accepted $50,000 as was heard on an audio tape recorded by the FBI in September 2024. And you did not answer the question. Thank you for your time this morning.

No, I said that I don't have next.

And gone just kicks him off the show. Every single interviewer should treat these guys like this. If there's a criticism here of Stephanopoulos is that he actually should have jumped in more quickly and said, ah, not the question I asked, Mr. Vice President. Let me ask the question again and see if you want to take another shot at it. And one of the things about J.D. Vance, these are not novel techniques. Answer like media trainers will tell you, reframe the question to one that's more favorable to you. Did he take the money? He didn't take a

bribe. OK, classic example. Pivot elsewhere. This is really about people upset that Tom Homan is doing great work kicking people out of the country or whatever. Go back at the person asking you the question. He's doing all the things that you're trained to do, although some media trainers would say don't attack the person asking the question.

It sort of depends on the environment. But the problem for J.D. is that he comes off too condescending. He comes off patronizing. He comes off too slick with his whole I don't even know what you're talking about. I'm sure he's been paid money for work that he's done over his career. No, no, no. That's not what we're been paid money for work that he's done over his career. No, no, no. That's not what we're talking about. Good for George Stephanopoulos. He could have done even better. And this is how