Lefties Losing It: Oprah abandons the ginger and whinger

It's time for Lefties Losing It.Let's start with some tone -deaf celebrity virtue signalling from the dumb and delusional.Here is actress Poppy Liu who left communist China to come to capitalist America only to complain about Capitalism.

My rant is that capitalism is the greatest evil in the world.Like the people that are like, oh, but like, don't you enjoy the nice things?Yes, I do.And also, I would be OK with it if it meant that more people in the world could live without oppression.Like, hello.

Yeah, she's not complaining about the oppression in China, the ethnic genocide of the Uyghurs, the gross human rights abuses in that country, including the jailing, torture and killing of political dissidents.No.The Millionaire Actress is railing against capitalism.Let's now hear from one of the dimmest individuals to ever anchor a program on MSNBC, and that is a very low bar indeed, folks.Here is Joy Reid with Don Lemon.It's clear these two have no idea how DEI actually works.

And JD Vance has also been under attack from another wildly delusional individual, some awkward dude called Clavicula, who has convinced himself that he's super hot.This imbecile even uses a hammer to reshape his face and he says, He's voting for Gavin Newsom because Gavin's hot.

against J .D.Vance because J .D.Vance is subhuman and Gavin Newsom mugs.J .

D.Vance is subhuman?What makes you say that?He's got a very short total facial width to height ratio, he's obese, very recessed side profile, whereas Newsom is like 6 '3 Chad.

to Saturday Night Live or should be Saturday Night Lame because it is as funny as a migraine these days.It's supposed to be a comedy show.And the reason why it's so unfunny is because they refuse to use the rich material the loony left provide daily.Instead, they're hyper focused on bashing conservatives.Ninety one percent of their content is about bashing conservatives.And that means they need to come up with lies to set up jokes instead of using the real world craziness of the modern left who give us so much content daily.

Now watch this sketch on Trump and Jeffrey Epstein and note that Epstein was a Democrat.You won't know this watching this sketch.Epstein wasn't just a Democrat, he was a Democrat donor, someone who hated Donald Trump and plotted to destroy him because Donald Trump cut all ties with him.banned him from Mar -a -Lago, and this was years before he was convicted of anything.Epstein and his off -sider, Ghislaine Maxwell, cozied up to the Clintons, not the Trumps.But all of that doesn't matter when you're Saturday Night Live and determined to be TDS afflicted and painfully unfunny.

So what are you up to these days, Jeff?How's heaven?

It's really, really hot.You know me, I keep busy.Mahjong every Wednesday with Stalin and John Wayne Gacy.That guy has stories.What else?Oh, I just wrote for the Kevin Hart Roast.

Had some fun zingers in there.What about you, Donnie, baby?

Any fun summer plans?we've got the World Cup, UFC fight on my lawn like I'm white trash on Worldstar, and we're also doing the Patriot Games where high school athletes come from all over the country.

And that, my dear close friend, that is a beautiful thing.

Told you, lame.So lacking in wit, so boring, and funny.false.As author Daniel Friedman noted on X, progressives like to talk about how Trump's name appears hundreds of times in the Epstein files but this is because Epstein was an MSNBC watching boomer lib who was constantly campaigning about Trump to anyone who would listen to him whine.There are no communications between Trump and Epstein in any of the emails.Now to New York City where we hear from two Luigi Mangione fangirls.

These are members of the press credentialed by Mayor Mamdani, they are openly endorsing murder, celebrating murder, mocking the children of the murdered victim Brian Thompson.This is Ashley Rojas and Lina Wiesbrot.Watching this you know precisely who they voted for.Yes, callous, vicious, and yet convinced that they are your moral superiors.Let's bring in Sky News contributor, Kosha Agheda.Kosha, That is disturbing, but as we saw with the Charlie Kirk murder, the left's tolerance of violence, its celebration of violence is a growing problem.

problem.It's not isolated to the extremes anymore.

It isn't.I think the Charlie Kirk thing really laid that bare.It was hundreds of thousands of people in terms of there was this period of two weeks afterwards where people were exposing TikTok celebrations and emails and Facebook posts, not just from anybody, from nurses, from teachers, from people that are supposed to be responsible and caring.And this follows up.There have been many, many Instagram influences in Australia.Yes, absolutely.

Around the world.And Luigi Mangione also has his sort of fan club or these groupies who like that.And here they don't even have the facts right because they take Brian Thompson as sort of an incarnation of all that is wrong with health care and the distorted cost of health care.Which makes no sense at all, because he was actually somebody who came from pretty humble beginnings and worked his way up the corporate ladder.He is not healthcare, but that's how they think about it.So it's even more foolish on top of that.

But it is a real problem and you don't see any accountability coming from it.There's nothing legally that you can do because it's just speech, but firing people or somehow ostracizing them socially are things that should be done and we don't see it being done and therefore it's going to continue.

Well, the fact that those two had press credentials, I think, troubled a lot of people as well.I mean, how is Mayor Manmohan Dhani's office giving press credentials to those individuals who are there mocking the children of the murder victim.I mean, it's one thing to be there and fangirling a murderer, but to be mocking the victim's family, I think is just crossing a line.

Yeah, it's a good point.And it's the opposite of ostracizing them.He's giving them press passes.So we will see if any accountability comes, but I'm not holding my breath.

Now, let's go to Louisiana.And we spoke yesterday about how every rhino pretty much in America is being primary to hell and back.And Bill Cassidy, maybe the biggest loser yet.CNN's Harry Enten looked into the archives and he didn't find anything like this since World War II.

How bad Bill Cassidy?He got 25 % of the vote, okay.I went back and I looked at every single non -appointed senator.This in my mind was the worst primary showing ever, at least since the end of World War II.That is how badly Bill Cassidy did.He did worse than every single one, getting 25 % of the vote for a senator in a primary.

It's literally unheard of.And that is because, of course, Donald Trump won.endorsed against this guy.

Look.There's losing and there's losing that dude is going to regret that impeachment vote kosher.

And Harry Anton is the best thing on CNN.Looks in and put a lot of energy.The man is always up here.Yes.Takes data and makes it really interesting.Now we know since World War Two, you know how how this has happened.

And this is a ruby red state, Louisiana.He was the incumbent senator.That's what Harry Anton was getting at that.This should not happen.It would never happen.It's a safety.

He came third in a three way race.Right.That's how badly he did.He had challengers because they knew that he split from the base.I think every single person who voted to impeach Trump in those J6 trials is gone.Either some of them didn't even run again.

They stepped out of the arena or those who ran.Liz Cheney, chief among them, was handily defeated.He's one of the last remaining ones.So it's certainly another feather in Trump's cap.because January 6th, specifically that issue, it was so clear to the Trump base about how distorted that was and just the weight of the government and everything around not only him, but his supporters and any Republican that voted for that sort of sham hearing, as it's called, has paid the price.

Absolutely.It's one thing where they haven't forgotten because Trumpthe election campaign, this was such a big issue for the base, the fact that there was going to have to be some sort of a reckoning about these issues.And a lot of that's kind of been forgotten.We really haven't had the indictments and the convictions and the people held responsible for some of the politicisation of these agencies, for the whole Russian collusion hoax.When it comes to primering the people who voted to impeach, they have followed through with that.

Now, let's go to D .C., where Judge Jeanine Pirro, as she was known on Fox News, she's now the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and she is laying down the law.

These are not harmless gatherings.They are violent and they are disrupted.And you can see from the from what happened at Chipotle's this past weekend.It was not just violence occurring between individuals, it was simply destruction of property.It was a takeover of a restaurant by individuals who felt that they could get away with it.Well, they're not going to get away with it.

Koshia, she went on to say the city belongs to law -abiding citizens and she's going to be taking a zero -tolerance approach to law and order.

She's on that spectrum to Nayib Bukele that we always talk about.She's like, you know, closer into that.And in D .C.in particular, two things happen.One is Trump appointed her to serve in this role.

People forget she was a judge.She wasn't just a TV personality.She's tough as nails.That's why they call the judge Jeanette.And then the because a lot of people diminish that, like, oh, he's got all these TV people in there.And then the other thing is the putting the National Guard.

That was very controversial at the time.You can federalize law and order in D .C.since it's a federal district.So that was an extra lever available only for D .C.

Those two things have made a difference.Crime is down, homicides are down.But these things, what she's showing over there, they're calling it teen takeovers.which of course euphemizes it like some kind of Disney movie or something.But that's like complete vandalism.And she's saying that she's gonna hold them accountable and their parents.

It'll be interesting which statutes you can apply to the parent if the crime was committed by someone else.But if they're under 18, presumably there's something in the law available to her, and that's another angle she's trying and hopefully that makes a difference.

Yeah, I'm glad you mentioned the way that they're trying to minimise the criminality here.Like it's just some harmless TikTok phenomenon, you know, just because it's being taped and shared online doesn't mean that people aren't being terrified, people aren't being hurt and property isn't being vandalised.And we saw there it was pretty lawless.Now, let's look at a Democrat and leftist activist, Mark Cuban, standing with the man that we Thought he loathed Donald Trump at the White House, this happened earlier today to promote cheaper prescription drugs.Kosha, tell me about the significance of this policy.I did not think I would see these two standing together being all friendly or trying to be friendly.

They've known each other for 20 years.They're both billionaires.They're both TV personalities.So there's this love -hate relationship, I think is how Cuban described it.And there are people who really, really hate Trump, truly.And then there's people who I think it's a bit more performative.

But then when the election is over, they can maybe work together and maybe, in credit to Mark, he is one of them.This policy It's a step in the right direction for the fundamental problem of healthcare costs in America, which is completely distorted, huge, biggest bucket in household spending, 20 % of GDP.So it's a step in the right direction.It doesn't solve the biggest problems that leads to that distortion in the market.But what they're basically trying to do is improve transparency of pricing for generic drugs and trying to remove the opacity of the insurance layer that is a big cause for why The pricing is very distorted in the U .S.

for drugs.You go through insurance.There'sThere's no transparency between the buyer and the seller.And these websites and Trump Rx, which is a portal, and then it goes to websites like Mark Cuban's online pharmacy that he founded a couple of years ago and Amazon and others.be a step in the direction of improving that transparency to bring drugs down.

It maybe makes a difference to like 10 percent of the household cost of health care.So it's something and a step in the right direction.It's good to see a little bit of bipartisan efforts to solve some of these fundamental problems in the American economy.

Absolutely.Because, yeah, there are there are people getting very rich in unscrupulous fashion.So we're all for addressing that.We're not for unfettered capitalism, not on this show.Now, Trump spoke about working with Mark Cuban despite the fact that Cuban endorsed Kamala Harris campaigned for her.Trump had this to say, well, he made a mistake.

It was a big mistake.So that's actually very diplomatic of him.I could have expected him to say a lot more.Now, before you go, Spanish police have ordered warned that Islamist terrorists could exploit the government's mass migrant legislation program.Spain's Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez approved a major initiative last month to grant legal status to half a million undocumented individuals.Kosha, an internal police memo showed that complaints over missing documents like passports have Risen among migrants who seek to benefit from this scheme.

So surprise surprise you might have some Islamists using this scheme to get a foothold in Spain and once you're in Spain You have got access to other EU countries, of course, and I appreciate the memo, but we don't need a memo We know it's obvious the police knows it Pedro Sanchez knows it and he's still doing it and that actually is the reason why

All these leaders know it at this point.And the ones that are of the left are still pushing unfettered immigration.Illegally being lax, legally having all these programs, refugees, asylum, temporary protected status, students, temporary workers that are never temporary.And then later on, they'll give amnesty, like this bill.And of course, even those people are not helpful to the country, hence the whole immigration debate.But then on top of that, there's this extra layer that there can be very nefarious actors that use these very weak laws to their advantage.

could be terrorists, could be all sorts of gang members in the US and other people that get in.And nobody asked for it.Nobody's voting for it.The people of Spain, I'm sure, don't want it, as we can see in poll after poll.But here it is.

But half a million, that's not an insignificant number.Could that impact future elections in Spain?

Yes.I think, you know, this is a double dynamic where, on the one hand, the people don't want it.And that's why you keep seeing this wave of populism and right wing nationalist leaders succeeding in Europe, Latin America, North America.But then simultaneously, the other fact is you're letting these people in and they tend to vote left.And so it's sort of a numbers game that you let in half a million people in time, they're going to out vote.the actual Spaniards who don't want it.

So I think it's becoming more and more the issue of our time in every election.And the stakes are just getting higher and higher as both sides.

Well, there's a clear incentive there, isn't there?If you're a hard left socialist government and you want to bolster your vote, granting half a million asylum seekers or people in the country illegally citizenship, that's going to help you at the polls.And I think that's a big reason why it's happened.Around the world.Thank you so much for your time.at the United Kingdom rally over the weekend and then huge numbers showed up even after Keir Starmer and others on the left tried to categorise this rally as racist and divisive and led by thugs and extremists.

Andrew, people still showed up.

Oh, absolutely.And they always say, George Orwell says, look, if liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.And I can tell you, I have on my show many people from all sorts of political persuasions.I went down to the rally.I was given a backstage pass and interviewed a lot of the key speakers basically to clarify what happened.Keir Starmer, you remember, he went to the Oval Office.

He met with Trump and reassured Trump in February 2025 that freedom of speech is alive and Well, in the UK, well, I can tell you it's in a critical condition because he actually banned a number of the speakers who are going to be coming over here, people who are MEPs, people who had so on and so forth.And his justification was that there were going to be extremist views and so on and so forth.And what happens, Rita, is they shut down.down debate by labeling it as far right.And I put it to a number of the people, including the organizers, basically, OK, this is unite the kingdom.Which part of the kingdom is welcome in this discussion?

And I looked at the crowds and interviewed people.They were from all races, all creeds, all persuasions and so on and so forth.There were family members there with their children and so on and so forth.And it was a very friendly event.And they had a similar event in Christmas when they were putting Christ into Christmas and they had gospel singers, they had black gospel singers, they had preachers there, they read from the scriptures and so on and so forth.So to label thing as far -right is just to dismiss that argument.

And it's not far -right to turn around and question and be concerned about things.And I always say, look, truth is the best remedy, believe it or not.My only mistress is the truth.And when I interview people from all political persuasions, it's to look at that sort of side.Sunlight is the best disinfectant.Let's look at the real issues and try to find out causes and also resolution.

Because jaw, jaw, not war, war has to be the key message.

Well, there are people from all sorts of backgrounds at these rallies.We played a number of clips yesterday showing people from all across the ethnic spectrum showing up.But one of the things that I noted, which I guess surprised a few people, was the amount of Christian symbolism that was there, Andrew.Tell me about that.

which is interesting.You say about surprising people.I think that's right.What happens is when you label something as far right, people don't even bother to listen to it.They assume that that's right.And there is so much misinformation and disinformation.

We're drowning in a sea of fake news, if you like, where debate is shut down by these labels.And they're basically smears.And what happens is a number of the people who were banned are going to threaten to sue Keir Starmer as a result of it.We have an MEP the future and we had that discussion about freedom of speech but not freedom from consequences because you work out where is the line and obviously inciting violence and inciting anything which is criminal is clearlynot acceptable.Defamation has its own laws and people will basically have to respond to that as well.

But basically asking people to question things, to use their own minds, to gather their own intelligence has got to be right.But he was very concerned about that.I also talked to a number of other people.There was a deputy leader of, well, previously of Reform UK, now the leader of Advance, a chap called Ben Ben Habib, who you may or may not know, he had a big spat with Piers Morgan because he used the phrase homegrown culture.And Piers Morgan ranted and raved and said, well, that's racist and so on and so forth.And I clarified on my show basically, well, what did you mean, Ben?

And when he talks about homegrown culture, because his own Father is Pakistani.He's from Punjab.He's over here in his 90s.And he's not saying, of course, we're not talking about deporting him.We're talking about assimilation.If people come over here, it's basically making sure you respect the culture and so on and so forth.

You're not trying to fight against the government.And so people are welcome.And I think that's what we have to try and do.Get away from the rhetoric.Ask people directly what they mean.Get those views clarified.

And that's what I say.Jaw, jaw, not war, war.that's how we do it and as I said beforehand when basically I put it this way is that when the love of power is surpassed by the power of love that's how you get peace.

Now before you go I want to play you a clip from Australian actress Holly Valance who was at the rally and she had this to say.

Don't be embarrassed and don't be too scared to stand up for your country, the place that you love, that's given you everything, it's given you freedom, it's given you the great life that you have.Respect it.Respect the culture.Respect the flag.Don't be embarrassed to fly the flag.Be patriotic.

Stand in that.And don't let anybody tell you that you're a racist for doing so.It's disgusting.and treacherous and treasonous.

Andrew Hawley also said that she's proud to be right wing.It's a very unusual position when you're from the entertainment industry, but she's owning it.

Well, I think that's right.Well, I think people being proud of their country, being proud of their flag and so proud of their culture and rich heritage is not a bad thing.And it's slightly tongue in cheek.I saw Holly there as well.As I say, I spoke to lots of people to get lots of different views.And she's right in terms of I think she was basically dismissing the label.

If people are saying, look, this is just a smear, call me what you like, but these are my views.And that's my point, Rita.You're turning around and saying to people rather than put a label on them, ask them what their actual views are, because you're You'll find that most people, when you unpack it sensibly, would not disagree.Being proud is not a sin.Being concerned about some real issues is also not racist and shouldn't be dismissed on that sort of basis.It was a multicultural event.

It was a joyous event.Lots of people were very happy to be there.It was very peaceful.There was singing.There were lots of Christian symbols, as you say.And every color, every creed, every possible persuasion, young and old were there celebrating freedom of speech.

Let's not let freedom of speech die.It is our fundamental right.We must continue not just asking the questions, but questioning those answers.Absolutely.

Andrew Eborn, thank you so much for your time tonight.Let's get stuck into Royal and entertainment news.Joining me now is broadcaster and Sky News contributor Didi Dunleavy and we've got exciting news Didi, this is big media news.Broadcasters Karl Stefanovic and Eddie Maguire are going to be hosting a three -hour show on Radio Network Gold and nine streaming platforms every Friday afternoon.The long weekend will start airing June 19.Didi, this show is going to be

across broadcast, streaming radio, as well as by video streaming services like Stan and Nine Now.Eddie is going to be living up to his name, Eddie Everywhere with Carl.

Yeah, look, I'm really happy for him.And these two guys are friends, really good friends.They've been friends for decades.But do they have chemistry?You can be good friends and not have that on air chemistry.Well, if they do, we'll see it play out in front of us, both in whatever way you're watching it, whether it's broadcasting or listening to it.

Unlike Kyle and Jackie O, who were bickering behind the scenes, but we were led to believe they were great mates and chums and having a go at each other on air.Something doesn't add up with this story.Now, these two guys are big stars.And Friday 12 till 3 is not a prime time slosh.Exactly.

That's what I thought.Never mind the weird name, The Long Weekend, I guess.Yeah.weekends starting when their show starts midday.But you're right, it is not prime time.If you're gonna be once a week, why wouldn't you be in a drive slot at least when people are in the car?

12 to three, that's a bizarre time slot, I think.

So my suspicion is, bearing all that in mind, that they're going to test this show, they'll see what sort of audience feedback they get, they'll have a look at how the ratings play out, look at the time of year, mid -year that they're launching it, and when they've decided whether it's gonna be a hit or not, then I suspect the drive slot will be where they'll put it.

I would've thought the star power of these two You could test it in drive if it's once a week or breakfast or in a high profile time slot.I don't think you need to be, you know, hiding it away in Friday afternoon.I mean, these two are pros.

There's a few unknowns, though, because if they're networking, networking traditionally does not work.And we've got Eddie, who's very much known as a Melbourne personality.Carl, probably more Sydney.That will balance out.there still is this hostility from one city towards the other.

And I can just see who is going to hate this program just on the fact that you've got... two very high -profile, rich, white guys who are not painfully woke.Mind you, Eddie is off the left, he's just off the old -school, sensible left.Carl, I'm not even sure about.I think he's somewhere down the middle.So I think this show is gonna irritate possibly all the right people.

Probably, yes.But again, imagine their contact books between the two of them.Imagine their guest list on the show.And they're both experienced newsbreakers.So we're going to be hearing all the very latest of what's going on.So they'll be very switched on.

I think it'll be a successful show.And I really like both of them.But the only slight negatives, I think Eddie, towards the end of his breakfast show, his ratings had tapered off.So is there still an appetite amongst radio audiences to hear Eddie?I don't know.That's probably why they're testing it in this slot?

Well it is funny and I think in that radio program you really didn't see that so if he can be a bit more of himself and see some of the side of him we've seen in the podcasts he's done recently I think that could work out well.Now this is my favourite story of the week.Actress Rachel Griffiths made a surprise appearance yesterday in a Melbourne court after she was snapped side -by -side with Kate Sayers who is suing her husband for Luke Sayers for defamation over an embarrassing leward chess scandal which led to his resignation as president of the Carlton Football Club.Didi, it's understood Rachel Griffiths was in court for research purposes for possibly a new legal drama that's still in the works.This would be terrifying for the AFL and for Carlton if she's in there and she'sthinking this storyline would make a fantastic miniseries because this is just hugely embarrassing for so many high flies in this town.

Yes, well I would think that the AFL will be hoping that it can rely on the findings of its integrity unit.Oh yes, its integrity unit.Who investigated and found that there was no case for Luke Sayers to answer to.His wife's very keen to have all of this aired publicly and he's been trying to get the case moved to the family court so that there'll be less eyes upon it, whereas Kate Sayers, who's brought this defamation action, she's basically saying, I'm happy for the public to scrutinise.

Well, to give people a bit of background, a picture of Luke Sayers' penis was posted on X, on formerly Twitter, and he claimed he had been hacked.And then the claim to the AFL Integrity Unit and to Carlton was that she was the culprit.She was behind it.And she's saying that has destroyed or damaged my reputation.People have assumed that I'm the guilty party here.So she wants to clear her name and she wants all of this to be reported as the original case was reported in the media.

Well, he went even further than that.And he implied that she had mental health issues and that that was the reason that she did what she did.But to come back to Rachel Griffiths, very interesting.Apparently, in the court, she was sitting, taking notes and barefoot and very casual.And yet when she...Barefoot in court?

Yeah, I don't know why she took her shoes off.But when she left the court, if she was so laid back, then she could have left the court at any time.But she deliberately left the court with Kate Sayers.Now, We're told that these two didn't know each other before this case started and that whatever Rachel Griffiths is working on has nothing to do with this specific case.She's just looking at how defamation proceedings work.out.

I can't imagine a screenplay that would be more interesting than this.I would just dump whatever you're working on and do a drama series based on this.I don't know, I've also heard they mix in similar social circles, so whether they know each other or not.Now, let's talk about Labor's budget continuing to be the butt of Jokes as small business owners launch a viral AI meme campaign depicting the Prime Minister as their unwelcome co -founder after capital gains tax changes threatened to claim 47 % of their businesses.One Labor backbencher said they were embarrassed by the memes telling the Daily Telegraph half of these effing people are in my electorate.By doing this, they have made us a laughingstock in the heartland.

Some people in Labor seem to have forgotten that not everyone in business is rich and plenty of them vote for us.Didi, there's some funny examples out there.They're amazing.I've seen so many and I think it's a meme that's going to have some legs.We're going to see this over and over again.Yeah.

And it's funny because it's true.You are going to have people who've worked their butts off and suddenly...Alba owns 47 percent of their company.

Yeah.So these memes are basically saying, look, he's taking so much of our company and our profits that we may as well have him on the payroll anyway.And look, he's wanted to be a hit on social media and he's wanted to go viral.Now he's got it.And it's probably not in the way that he would like.There's absolutely nothing he can do about it, because if he arcs up, people are just going to double down and do worse.

And I think a lot of the people who are creating and sharing and liking these memes are people who probably voted Labor, probably voted for Anthony Albanese who've got buyers remorse and are feeling very cheated and while it's two years until they can actually exercise their vote at the polls, in the meantimethis is their way of expressing their thoughts.And I'm loving it.I'm here for it.

It's fantastic because you're so right.Politicians from all parties invest so heavily in social media.They spend a lot of time on it.Sometimes they spend a lot of money on it.And invariably, it doesn't work.It's lame.

It doesn't resonate.It doesn't go viral.And this has just happened organically.And this is precisely what Labor don't want.Now, before you go, Oprah Winfrey, she is reportedly leading the charge of Hollywood A -listers distancing themselves from Harry and Meghan as the couple's downfall continues.One insider told the Daily Mail that Winfrey is long arming the Sussexes, but won't let them drink too far away because quote if something happens one of the three big D's divorce death or drama she will want the interview oh that sounds like Oprah Any sympathy here for the ginger in the wine jar?

No, absolutely none.I think in Oprah's case, she copped so much flack after that interview she did with Megan because it was a really poor interview.She didn't put any hard questions to her.So the whole thing was just embarrassing for her.But she's probably just maintaining that little bit of contact.It's like Netflix.

They've just left the door ajar a tiny, tiny bit because they're all waiting for the divorce.And there was rumours that there was some sort of a deal being done behind the scenes.for the divorce book, if it ever happens.Nobody ever came out and sued or denied that very strongly.So I think a lot of these media entities are just sitting here waiting for the whole marriage to come undone and for that story to be told.Because Megan will want to tell her side of the story, I would think.

I mean, you can just see post -divorce, you can see Megan having a glow up.She is going to do so many magazine covers.She's going to have all thesetting happening.How is Harry going to handle that?Because right now he doesn't have his family's support.

Will they accept back the prodigal son?I know we are going way ahead.Maybe there will never be a divorce.

But if I was a betting woman, I'd bet on one.I have no doubt in my mind that the royals would accept him back without Meghan.She's the problem for them.They've got her for life now.They've got two children, a prince and a princess, Didi.Didi Dunleavy, always a pleasure.

Thanks, Rita.