Nicola Sturgeon Caught Out: The BBC Interview Exposed

So, like many, I've just watched the Nicola Sturgeon interview with Lorna Kunzberg on BBC, which is why I'm here.BBC's just over there.I thought it'd be quite fitting to come here and do such a video.So, what did we learn?Well, I thought it was actually shocking.And a lot of people involved in this on the periphery, who may or may not have known of its things, are doing far too much talking.

I've already done videos about Nicola Sturgeon and things she's said since this guilty plea.I've already covered things and claims by Hamza Yousaf and I've also covered claims by Nicola Sturgeon's sister Gillian and Nicola Sturgeon's just done the exact same again today.Houston we have a solution.Not bad, I'll just pause just now.What she's done, she made some admissions, she made some contradictory claims, she got her timeline mixed up when she was trying to defend her actions when the finance team from SMP resigned.So there was about four or five things during that interview that just rotten.

Now I'm just speaking to John there, you maybe heard him shouting on me, a guy I've not seen for years, I just stopped recording there to get a chat with him and he was telling me, I watched the thing coming out live and it was about 20 minutes, half an hour interview, but he was saying that there might be a 55 minute, the full interview, because obviously it was edited on this morning's programme and it was part of our panel discussion, so we maybe didn't see the full lot.So I'm not even going off the 55 minutes worth of the interview.I'm leaking off the edited version.So it'll be interesting after speaking to John and hello to his missus, they watch all the stuff.I've known them for years through their community council work.they've done as volunteers many, many months ago.

Anyway, so I'll need to get a watch at that and there might be another video for this in the pipeline, but the stuff that got my attention is frightening enough.For example, she admitted that she had received many gifts that she's since found out or stolen or partly that's fraud.

I'm now in a position where even some of my birthday presents and Christmas presents have turned out to be a lie and that's really difficult to come to terms with for anybody in private but I'm doing this in the full glare of publicity and I understand why.

Now there's a crime I'm not even sure if it's a British crime but certainly in Scotland the crime of reset and what that means basically is if you received something as a gift in good faith then that's fine But if you later discover that that gift was stolen or fraudulently obtained, then if you hold on to that gift, you're guilty of a claim called reset.Now, you quite clearly hear her claiming as much during the video.Another thing that she made claim to, which I thought was very bizarre, was she was talking about the SMP's finance team that left and how she was unable at that time, and Laura Coonisby, to be fair, did challenge her on this when she said that she was unable at that time to discuss things like the missing money from the pot.What she claims they were discussing at the time was did that £600 ,000 in ink fence money get used for the election campaign?which was not the purpose of having it, and she claims that even that she could not talk about the investigation at the time, so she couldn't have, she wouldn't have been able to discuss any claims about the money being physically missing.Well, I've got news for you there, Nicola.

Your finance team left in the March 2021 branch form, didn't they start until July 2021?So that was complete folly, complete lies, completely made up.because the timescale and the timeline of events is simply not possible.

The concerns were, and remember by this time there was a police investigation underway, so I also had to be careful that I was not doing anything to step on the toes of a police investigation.The police investigation started around, if memory serves me correctly, the spring of 2021.So by this time that these concerns were being raised, the police were looking into the SNP financing.

She made claims about having never ever seen some of the items that were on the indictment that her husband's admitted to.Expensive watches.I never saw those watches.

Until they were asked about in the context of a criminal investigation, I didn't know they existed.You mention a onesie.Never, never ever saw it.

Which is bizarre, because the items that she was talking about were the designer watches and a male onesie that she'd never seen.So that beggars the question, she'll have with this man through the 12 years of these crites, if he never wore the watch or the onesie, and she never seen it on him, then who?will the designer watch and the male onesie for?She made a quite outrageous claim that when she was being asked about the accounts and tens of thousands of pounds worth of lines in the accounts which were shown for, you know, money spent on vehicles and she said that she never ever seen those things, never seen them.She didn't pay that much attention that she was able to tell his that delivery, I mean, it's there, I've never seen them on the accounts.However, within a sharp intake of breath, she then goes on to tell you that in those accounts, it wasn't the cost for the motorhome, were not shown as motorhome, they were quite simply motor vehicles, and how she felt that that could have been for hired cars, etc., etc., etc., quite how you would think you'd spend a thousand pound a week on hired cars, because it was 50 grand, right, and that was for a year's accounts.

leaves a bit to the imagination but that's our claim.

What did you think?It was when you saw in the SNP's accounts in 2021 that shows clearly tens of thousands of pounds being spent on motor vehicles for a political party.

That didn't register with me in the accounts.Do you remember seeing it?I don't remember seeing it.The National Treasurer didn't draw it to my attention.You don't recall seeing it in the accounts?No, I don't.

As a member of the NEC, as all members of the NEC, the National Treasurer would present them.The National Treasurer would draw to our attention any items he thought we should pay particular attention to, and people in the NEC would ask questions.But no, I look back on this and think, I wish I had.The thing about, it wasn't for me.now that I've seen it, it doesn't say motorhome, it says motor vehicles, that could have been the rental of motor vehicles or something like that, so it didn't particularly jump out as something that caused me to question things.

The next thing that jumped out at me, I'm not sure if it's criminal or just bad practice, but she was talking about the initial stages of the investigation and how she knew that the investigation had moved on from just wondering if this £600 ,000 that was meant to be ring -fenced had been used for election campaigning costs and how she knew when it moved on from that and there was potential of money being misappropriated and used to buy things and she claims that that's when other people started getting asked by the police about purchases.

When did you begin to suspect that there had been a wrongdoing?Early in 2023, around about the spring I think of 2023, there was, it became clear that some people who were being interviewed by the police were being asked not just about this issue of referendum funding used for election campaigns, but there were questions being asked about the purchase of individual items.

Now I'm not sure if that's criminal to be discussing what the police ask others about.There's the sun out again.It's trying hard, isn't it?Look back there, a big bit of shade.That isn't even as shady as Morrell, by the way.And anyway, back to the point.

So I'm not sure if it is criminal or not to discuss with others once you've been asked for statements by police, but certainly it's happened.I think it would be poor judgment to do so, but I'm not sure if it's criminal or not, but it just shows you how blasé she is, because her words were, not verbatim, but basically saying that she knew that other people were being asked by the police about purchases by the SNP.It gives you a good insight into the mind of this treacherous person and this treacherous party and what was going on.back then and it's chaos, absolute chaos, but these people were running Scotland and had done for two decades and now people like myself have been questioned as to why we're asking so many questions.I think we're tipping the iceberg stuff here if I'm perfectly honest.Anyway if you enjoyed this video do me a favour click thumbs up as you've been doing great been a really busy week obviously a lot of the stuff I've been covering has been around this case so the video's been doing well and one of the main reasons is you've been smashing the comments button so please continue to do that and just double check you're still subscribed.

What YouTube will do now is up here they'll put a video that they believe you've not seen and that one's quite a good one and down here there'll be a logo if you're not subscribed just click that but more important than all that I'm sure the type of person that shouts at the press for asking you questions but then organises one -to -one interviews with the press.Not you, but everyone else.Have a great day.Cheerio bye now.